The Phoenix Network:
 
 
 
About  |  Advertise
Moonsigns  |  BandGuide  |  Blogs
 
 

McCain's Curve Ball

I thought both candidates did fine tonight -- except for how John McCain dropped a massive new policy proposal into the campaign (to empower Treasury to buy and renegoatiate failing mortgages) that will force his campaign to talk about the economic crisis for the coming days, and specifically to explain what the hell he's thinking with this wildly impulsive approach.

McCain blunted its impact in the debate, by failing to mention -- any of the several separate times he brought it up -- that this was an entirely new proposal for him. To most viewers, I suspect that they didn't know it was knew, didn't really understand its value, and quickly forgot about it. This also allowed Obama, who clearly was blindsided by it, to simply ignore it rather than get forced into responding to it on the fly (and possibly validating it before his staff has a chance to pick it apart). In addition, the media was so blindsided by it, that from what I can tell they're ignoring it in the discussion afterward -- so he's getting no 'game-changing' buzz, at least initially, for having dropped what he presumably wants to be seen as a bold, new proposal to the crisis.

Of course, the plan is not entirely new -- versions of it were discussed during the bailout debate, and were rejected, mostly because Secretary Paulsen said that it would be impractical, if not impossible, to create the necessary vast bureaucracy in the short time necessary to have any impact.

According to a short release on the plan, released by the McCain campaign during the debate tonight, the direct costs of the plan would be $300 billion -- which McCain wants to divert directly from the just-passed $700 billion bailout plan. The campaign argues that, with this plan in effect (they're calling it the "McCain Resurgence Plan"), much of the Wall Street bailout would prove unnecessary.

So, what we have here is that John McCain rushed back to Washington to help negotiate a bailout bill, voted for it, and then announced plans to completely undermine it with another, totally different plan.

I'll leave it to others to assess the plan in greater detail, but in general this sort of plan is much-loathed by conservatives, and many people consider it by nature pretty fundamentally unfair. (For example, it rewards those who are failing to pay their mortgage, but not those in exactly the same circumstances who do pay -- indeed, for many homeowners whose homes have dropped significantly in value, this would create an incentive to stop paying the mortgage.) Also, as noted, the Treasury Secretary has said it won't work.

 

  • Money, Stock and Finance » Blog Archive » Mccain’s Curve Ball said:

    Pingback from  Money, Stock and Finance  » Blog Archive   » Mccain’s Curve Ball

    October 8, 2008 2:16 AM
  • Michael Pahre said:

    The Treasury Secretary was already given the authority in the bailout bill to rewrite some mortgages -- those cases where the government buys up all of the pieces of mortgage-backed securities of a particular mortgage (or can twist arms of the other owners of that security).

    McCain also seems not to realize that July's bill (Economic Recovery Act of 2008) allows the FHA to rewrite mortgages obtained in the government takeover of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac -- on a voluntary basis, where the government then gets a portion of any subsequent profits on housing appreciation.

    Did McCain read either of these bills?

    Note that Democrats were arguing in the negotiations in the last few weeks for greater authority to do exactly what McCain is calling for now, but that Congressional Republicans fought successfully against expanded authority over what made it into the final bill.

    That McCain is now calling for this mortgage plan indicates:  (1) how he did *not* stand up to leaders in his own party on this issue; and (2) that he is now trying to undermine a bi-partisan bill.  Both go against McCain's claims about himself.  Didn't he read his campaign's memo about its talking points?

    October 8, 2008 10:02 AM
  • LorenzoJennifer said:

    Your acknowledgement of those who've kept their mortgage payments up to date echoes Bill Clinton's 1992 campaign comment that the system doesn't reward those who play by the rules and do the right thing.  

    The federal bailout may have any of the following as subtitles:

    "The road to hell is paved with good intentions";

    "Blessed are those who expect nothing for they shall never be disappointed";

    "No one ever went broke underestimating the intelligence of the American people";

    "Bad things happen to good people";

    and, as $700 billion is merrily sent to Wall Street just in time as a Christmas present,

    "Good things happen to bad people."

    So, the "federales" will now be real estate agents?  Would you buy a used house from John McCain?

    October 8, 2008 4:05 PM

Leave a Comment

Login | Not a member yet? Click here to Join

(required)  
(optional)
(required)  




Friday, December 05, 2008  |  Sign In  |  Register
 
thePhoenix.com:
Phoenix Media/Communications Group:
TODAY'S FEATURED ADVERTISERS
Copyright © 2008 The Phoenix Media/Communications Group