The Phoenix Network:
 
 
About  |  Advertise
Adult  |  Moonsigns  |  Band Guide  |  Blogs  |  In Pictures
 

Reflections of a departing Globe veteran

Just had an interesting conversation with David Mehegan, who's taking the current newsroom buyout and leaving the Globe after 33 years. Mehegan currently covers publishing and literary affairs for the paper; he's previously been book editor, a writer for the Globe's Sunday magazine, a copy editor for the op-ed pages, and a part-timer on the night desk.

During our chat, Mehegan had some interesting things to say about the state of the Globe, where the newspaper business is headed, and why--despite the undeniably miserable Zeitgeist--those of us who get paid to do journalism are actually pretty fortunate. Here's an edited transcript:

It just seemed to me that I’d had a really good run here, and I wanted to make the move before I was too old to do something else. I didn't want to just go on until I was exhausted; that's part of it. My hope is to write books, to teach, to do things in editing and publishing.
Also, of course, the atmosphere around here is pretty grim. It just didn’t seem to me to make sense to hang on and hold out until the last possible paycheck, before they chain the door shut, or whatever is going to happen. Nobody knows; I sure don’t.

The other thing is, when they made this buyout offer, they made plain that what they didn't get through buyouts they'd get through layoffs. That meant that everyone who doesn’t take the buyout is one more layoff. And I just didn’t like the idea that somebody who has kids in college, or really has no other options, might get laid off, when I can do other things. I'm eligible for a pension, but I'm not going to take it yet; I can still do other things.

[The publishing and literary beat] is a great one; it was right for me. But things are changing. There's no Living/Arts section. I used to write these great profiles that were combined with great art and design, and now the section's gone. In many ways, I feel as if the paper I used to write for has already departed. We can't do the stories we used to do, and we don' t have freedom to write in the way we used to; everything has to be shorter and tighter. I don't know what they're going to do with my old beat, but I do know it's one people are intenseley interested in.

I think [Globe editor] Marty Baron's done a wonderful job under very difficult circumstances. I have a lot of respect for him. But the old business model's broken, and it's not coming back. Somehow or other, I believe there will be newspapers, and there will be journalists. But we have to figure out a new way to pay for it, and we haven't figured that out--who's going to pay what it takes to do excellent reporting and careful writing, and who's going to buy it in what form when it's done.

If the Globe were to disappear, I think there'd be such shock--it'd be like the Red Sox disappearing. It's hard for people to imagine. And I include the Herald in that, too. Once you don't have a newspaper--the San Francisco Chronicle may disappear at any moment!--it's going to take a while for that to sink in. When politicians are corrupt, and you don't find out, I think that's going to create uneasiness in the minds of many people in many cities.

We may see some innovative way to bring papers back, either on a nonprofit basis or a co-op basis, like what the ex-Rocky Mountain News people are trying to do. There's a lot of innovation that's going to go on. I just don't think it's going to be done by the management of papers as we now know them. I don't think they have the imagination. I shouldn't make a sweeping statement, but so far, what I see is just cutting and cutting and hoping some kind of miracle happens. I don't mean that that's the character of this company more than it is the character of any other. I just think that, for the most part, most newspaper management is in a state of shock. They're not really going to be the ones to do it.

But I have nothing critical to say about the Globe. It's really been a great run, and I've been very grateful to be here. As I've often said, there aren't many lines of work in this world where you get paid to tell the truth. That's what you're supposed to do: find out what happened, what really happened, and put it out there. And we get paid to do it. You can't beat that. 

  • Share:
  • Share this entry with Facebook
  • Share this entry with Digg
  • Share this entry with Delicious
  • Email this article to a friend
  • Print this article

5 Comments

  • endangeredcoffee said:

    no Living /Arts section.

    Two letters for that

    F G

    March 25, 2009 5:55 PM
  • JMehegan said:

    It was a great run. I think you will miss it for a few months, but then fresh activities will present more of a challenge. After a while, you will be telling the grandkids of the times when you used to work in that building there, as you drive by on the Southeast Expressway.

    I agree with some of the statements about the need for newspapers to innovate to newer formats in order to keep readership. I am stuck in the middle, where I still enjoy holding print in my hands, flipping through the New York Times, to read David Brooks or Paul Krugman, but then I grab my Blackberry(c) and will read the latest RSS feeds from BBC News, AP Mobile News Service, or Reuters. The newer generations want their five second headlines and scroll along the bottom of the screen.

    Journalist will adapt, overcome and continue - everyone needs news, but newspapers may be the next 8-track.

    I hope you find success in your new pursuits, joy in your family and friends and happiness in your health.

    Jeff (Step-son to David)

    March 25, 2009 8:59 PM
  • Newspaper Hawk said:

    Well, with all respect to David Mehegan, the "sweeping statement" he mentioned really pertains to the the Baby Boomer managers, and journalists, who, over the last 30 some years have had ALL the TIME in the world to innovate, and protect newspapers that are now about to go out of existance throughout this country (and others as well.)

    Frankly, many aging boomers falsely believed that they were going to live forever, and did the best they could to keep their jobs over three decades, while at the same time, continuing to force younger reporters to skip from paper to paper, town to town, who've had to face the same "unimaginative" baby boomer executives, publishers, managing editors, and city editors, as well as having to deal with unresponsive boomer journalists who sought more to protect their careerist positions, rather than to innovate before it was too late.

    Now, it is too late, and not only for baby boomers, who are lucky enough to even be offered "buyouts" rather than being laid off.

    You can't say that for the younger Generation X editors, reporters, etc., who now have NO newspaper to go to since the Baby Boomers, in their own greed and shortsightedness, have destroyed newspapers that lasted over 100 years.

    Unimaginative? You bet.

    It's downright gruesome and sad to see one generation take down the entire newspaper industry and expect all of us to cry about the "good run" they had.

    Great ride. But it's the last ride for any other generation since younger generations cannot follow to even clean up the mess the Baby Boomer generations has left behind.

    As for the newspapers ~ there won't be any "mess" to clean up since papers are falling left and right ~ destroyed by the generation that once said never trust anyone over 30.

    Great Job baby boomers.

    March 26, 2009 8:38 AM

Leave a Comment

Login | Not a member yet? Click here to Join
Follow the Boston Phoenix
twitter facebook myspace youtube rss
All Blogs
Related Articles

0911_coakley_listt
Boston Phoenix
The X factor
Published 11/27/2009 by DAVID S. BERNSTEIN
Come Monday, it's a one-week spring to the primary — and to capture the hearts of undecided voters.

0911_stopnshop_list
Boston Phoenix
IBEW pressures Stop & Shop
Published 11/27/2009 by CHRIS FARAONE
Power Play Dept.

more by Adam Reilly
Greg Epstein, Atheist Superstar | November 27, 2009
Unmaking a bad federal law | November 27, 2009
Collateral damage? | November 13, 2009
Holy terror? | November 13, 2009
Difference of opinion | November 06, 2009

 See all articles by: Adam Reilly

ADVERTISEMENT
Latest Comments
GodHatesFags.com Invades Greater Boston - This just another proof of religion promoting hate. Hate that gives excuse to some to commit horrible...

By Rachel Galindo on 12-02-2009 in Phlog

The Globe, Scott Brown, and abortion - Thanks for checking back in, Spilot. That wasn't my intention. The Globe description didn't seem to jibe...

By Adam Reilly on 12-02-2009 in Dont Quote Me

American Hi-Fi covers Miley Cyrus's "The Climb" - Watch The Twilight Saga New Moon Online for Free. Download The Twilight Saga: New Moon. The Twilight...

By abanicewafe on 12-02-2009 in On The Download

RIP, Mike Penner / Christine Daniels - O-FISH-L - just a quick point - it used to be a disorder to be homosexual. The treatment for women suffering...

By offal o-fish-l on 12-02-2009 in Dont Quote Me

City Council Forums - Ресурс предоставляет сведения о растениях, растущих на открытых почвах, информацию по выращиванию и опеке...

By JabJohazy on 12-02-2009 in Talking Politics

Latest Comments from Dont Quote Me
Most Viewed
Recap: Snoop Dogg, Devin the Dude, and Redman and Method Man at the House of Blues
Say Anything at the House of Blues | October 30
REVIEW: Thao Nguyen and The Get Down Stay Down at Middle East
Ticket On-Sale Alert: Harry and the Potters, Mario, Passion Pit, The Lion King, more
VIDEO: Halloween Mash UP
Mp3 of the Week: American Hi-Fi (with bonus Stacy Jones Q&A)
CLICK TRACKS: Music News Roundup (Walken' on Gaga, Weezer in Snuggies, Bono straddles the Berlin Wall, and more)
Most Viewed from Dont Quote Me
Search Blogs
 
Dont Quote Me Archives
Wednesday, December 02, 2009  |  Sign In  |  Register
 
TODAY'S FEATURED ADVERTISERS
thePhoenix.com
Phoenix Media/Communications Group
Copyright © 2009 The Phoenix Media/Communications Group