The Phoenix Network:
 
 
About  |  Advertise
Adult  |  Moonsigns  |  Band Guide  |  Blogs  |  In Pictures
 
Media -- Dont Quote Me  |  News Features  |  Talking Politics  |  This Just In

Toxic talk: Hating Obama

Repugnant anti-Obama hate speech has dissipated for the moment. How likely is it to raise its ugly head again?
By ADAM REILLY  |  January 19, 2009

090116_obama_main

Speak no evil: Why tightening up on anti-Obama speech is a bad idea. By Adam Reilly.
During and just after the 2008 presidential campaign, the antipathy of right-wing pundits toward Barack Obama reached remarkable, often repugnant depths. Some examples: talk-radio hatemonger Michael Savage warned his listeners that Obama was "hand-picked by some very powerful forces . . . to drag this country into a hell it has not seen since the Civil War." Jay Severin, Savage's Boston-based comrade-in-arms, called on his listeners to "destroy" Obama before he causes "our doom as a nation." (Severin's caveat — that this be done legally — was undercut by his statement that "Obama is King George and we are the Minutemen." The Minutemen weren't big on legality.) And Fox News commentator Liz Trotta quipped, with a chuckle and a smile, that it would be nice to assassinate both Osama bin Laden and Obama. (Trotta later said she was "so sorry" for her comments, and chalked them up to the "very colorful political season.")

Immediately following Obama's victory, meanwhile, similarly vile manifestations of this same mindset popped up around the country. In Maine, a convenience store hosted a betting pool on when Obama would be assassinated, accompanied by a sign that read: "Let's hope someone wins." And a North Carolina State student wrote a disgusting proposal — "Let's shoot that nigger in the head" — inside that school's Free Expression Tunnel.

Where, exactly, did all this anti-Obama venom come from? The fact that Obama's father was black — and that, according to the prevailing conceptualization of race, this makes Obama our first black president — obviously played a role, be it overt or covert. So, too, did the fact that Obama's surname happens to rhyme with "Osama" — and that, according to various bogus conspiracy theories, he's a closet Muslim, and/or a closet Marxist, and/or a buddy of terrorists, and/or a non-citizen whose ascent to the presidency, according to the United States Constitution, is illegal.

Given the manifold wellsprings of dislike and distrust for Obama, it might have been inevitable that things got as ugly as they did. Still, what made this festering animus so dismaying — apart from what it revealed about the deep recesses of our political id — is that it jeopardized Obama's promise as a political unifier. Remember, Obama burst on the scene with his brilliant keynote address at the 2004 Democratic National Convention, in which he spoke of transcending the bitter divides of American politics and culture. But two months ago, the president-elect looked, if anything, like the second coming of Bill Clinton — a gifted politician who, as president, could whip Rush Limbaugh and co. into a frenzy and polarize the nation.

In recent weeks, though, there's been a distinct drop-off in repugnant anti-Obama invective — in the conservative press, among the general public, even among white-supremacists. Which raises the question: is extreme Obama-phobia already a thing of the past? Or, instead, is it just on hiatus — and poised to return with a vengeance once Obama actually starts governing?

1  |  2  |  3  |  4  |   next >
Related: Rise of the political bogeyman, Take Back Barack, Party like it's 1999, More more >
  Topics: Media -- Dont Quote Me , Barack Obama, Michael Savage, Fairness Doctrine,  More more >
  • Share:
  • Share this entry with Facebook
  • Share this entry with Digg
  • Share this entry with Delicious
  • RSS feed
  • Email this article to a friend
  • Print this article
8 Comments / Add Comment

pchuck

Where did all the hate come from?  Where in heaven's name have you been for the past 8 years.  Haven't you paid attention to what the left has been calling Bush for the past 8 years?   An author won a prize for a novel about assassinating Bush.   9/11 Truthers.  Michael Moore.  The list goes on and on. 

Jeez, if you poison the well it doesn't magically clean itself up.  In fairness, Clinton got a lot of abuse too but it turned into an industry with Bush.   

Posted: January 15 2009 at 12:00 PM

Chilsden

The new agriculture secretary nominee, tom vilsack, is a shill for monsanto, the company that is the most aggressive in pushing toxic, genetically modified frankenfood.  You obamabots are so holier than thou-change, change, etc., but all you did was elect an enemy corporatist fraud.

Posted: January 15 2009 at 12:18 PM

Chilsden

It's obamination and vilsack's monsanto frankenfood that's toxic, not legitamite attacks on obamination.

Posted: January 15 2009 at 12:36 PM

Fake Name

What a ridiculous and poorly written article. BTW, have you ever listened to Air America?
Posted: January 16 2009 at 12:48 PM

scytale_

This is absolutely ridiculous. Bush is demonized and has more invective and hate sent his way than any president since Lincoln and poor Obama has some haters. Obama has terrible judgement, that is why conservatives do not like him. He picks 'pay to play" Richardson, "Marc Rich Fugitive Financier" pardoner Holder, "Tax Evader Tim" Geithner and multitudes of others to be in his cabinet. Yes he does say Marxist things like "spread the wealth around" that get him in trouble with folks like me that realize how scary that is. His view of a "flexible" Constitution based on a person's perspective is not what our founding fathers wanted. His animosity towards the 2nd Amendment in our"Bill of Rights" is why we do not like him. In closing, conservatives do not like him because of the "content of his character, not the color of his skin" Michael Steele all the way baby!
Posted: January 16 2009 at 6:59 PM

aging cynic

"Jeez, if you poison the well it doesn't magically clean itself up." Spot on. For every action, there is an equal and opposite reaction. The folks who hated Bush more than they loved their country are about to see the fruits of their labors. Nice work, a-holes.
Posted: January 17 2009 at 1:47 PM

bwanamogambo

Yup, I agree with aging cynic and scytale to a large extent.   Hating the fast talking Obama is fruitless though.  He primarily rose on the economic discontent and fear created by Clinton's signing of the Gramm-Leach-Bliley bill allowing for this now dead financial free-for-all.  A lot of the animosity comes from the fact that Obama 'has done nothing and done nothing' before being elected based solely on his rapping ability and charisma.  Things will probably get so bad in the next 4 years that the credit card companies will try to repossess our tattoos.

Posted: January 21 2009 at 11:25 AM

BostonDan

"In fairness, Clinton got a lot of abuse too but it turned into an industry with Bush. " It turned into an industry with Clinton. Fox News. Right wing talk radio as we know it. The liberals followed suit and heavily escalated with longstanding Hollywood connections and bombastic attacks. Hilarious to see every (non-biased in their minds I assume) previous commenters try but fail to assert that the history is any different. No, this shit started with Clinton, escalated with Bush and will go completely off the charts with Obama when unemployment is at 20% in 2010.
Posted: February 18 2009 at 1:27 AM
HTML Prohibited
Add Comment

PHX @ SXSW 2010
SXSW-2010
Today's Event Picks
ARTICLES BY ADAM REILLY
Share this entry with Delicious
  •   BULLY FOR BU!  |  March 12, 2010
    After six years at the Phoenix , I recently got my first pre-emptive libel threat. It came, most unexpectedly, from an investigative reporter. And beyond the fact that this struck me as a blatant attempt at intimidation, it demonstrated how tricky journalism's new, collaboration-driven future could be.
  •   STOP THE QUINN-SANITY!  |  March 03, 2010
    The year is still young, but when the time comes to look back at 2010's media lowlights, the embarrassing demise of Sally Quinn's Washington Post column, "The Party," will almost certainly rank near the top of the list.
  •   RIGHT CLICK  |  February 19, 2010
    Back in February 2007, a few months after a political neophyte named Deval Patrick cruised to victory in the Massachusetts governor's race with help from a political blog named Blue Mass Group (BMG) — which whipped up pro-Patrick sentiment while aggressively rebutting the governor-to-be's critics — I sized up a recent conservative entry in the local blogosphere.
  •   RANSOM NOTES  |  February 12, 2010
    While reporting from Afghanistan two years ago, David Rohde became, for the second time in his career, an unwilling participant rather than an observer. On October 29, 1995, Rohde had been arrested by Bosnian Serbs. And then in November 2008, Rohde and two Afghan colleagues were en route to an interview with a Taliban commander when they were kidnapped.
  •   POOR RECEPTION  |  February 08, 2010
    The right loves to rant against the "liberal-media elite," but there's one key media sector where the conservative id reigns supreme: talk radio.

 See all articles by: ADAM REILLY

MOST POPULAR
RSS Feed of for the most popular articles
 Most Viewed   Most Emailed 



Featured Articles in Media -- Dont Quote Me:
  |  Sign In  |  Register
 
thePhoenix.com:
Phoenix Media/Communications Group:
TODAY'S FEATURED ADVERTISERS
Copyright © 2010 The Phoenix Media/Communications Group