The Phoenix Network:
 
 
About  |  Advertise
 
Features  |  Reviews
Best2012Vote-1000x50

Photo op?

In Errol Morris’s Standard Operating Procedure , a picture is worth a thousand words
By PETER KEOUGH  |  May 1, 2008


More from Peter Keough's interview with Errol Morris

Bad seeds? Errol Morris checks the apples, not the tree. By Peter Keough.
After 11 days on the road promoting Standard Operating Procedure, his film about the Abu Ghraib prisoner-abuse scandal, Errol Morris is back in his Cambridge office. His interrogators from the media have hit him with the same difficult questions over and over. They haven’t broken him yet, but he admits he’s getting a little “punchy.” Now he sits at his desk, on which rests a laptop and a mummified chimpanzee head. A mounted horse’s head hangs on the wall behind him, and in the corner stands a stuffed stork. It’s surprisingly tall.

Morris has made films about loaded subjects before: the death penalty (Mr. Death: the Rise and Fall of Fred A. Leuchter, Jr.), Vietnam (The Fog of War), the mysteries of the universe (A Brief History of Time). But never as loaded as the shock and awe spread by the 2004 release of photos of sexually humiliated and physically tortured naked Iraqi prisoners taken by the MPs guarding them. The woman with the leash; the human pyramid; the smile and the thumbs-up next to a ravaged, dead face. Images we’d like to forget — and, apparently, have. None of the presidential candidates has had much to say about the subject, and none of the major media outlets paid much attention when our president acknowledged that, yes, he authorized such behavior. So probably the toughest question of all is — who’s going to care?

Frank Rich wrote in his column that Iraq movies are like garlic to vampires. Do you think this one is going to suffer the fate of all the others?
I like Frank Rich a lot. I know him. I like the whole editorial. I am not eager to have an obituary written for my film before the film appears in theaters. Can I say in good conscience it’s not an Iraq movie? I cannot. But I think it is a different kind of an Iraq movie. I wanted to avoid doing the same thing that other people were doing. I did it because I was genuinely interested in the photographs and the guys who took the photographs. It’s a different movie from what you expect. I think people all expect the other type of movie, and this is a movie that I think will be around long after the Iraq War. It’s telling a much bigger story, and it’s a story that does involve photography and people. I’ve heard from a number of people who watched the movie twice, even three times, that it changes for them. Each time, they see it differently.

That’s what I experienced.
Well . . . what happened in your case?

I had some frustrations the first time, and some of them were resolved the second time I saw it, but they were replaced with new frustrations . . . . 
Well, this is something I’d love to hear about. Can I ask some questions? Can I flip this around? What were your frustrations the first time?

1  |  2  |   next >
Related: Bad seeds?, Karen Schmeer: 1970-2010, Learning by doing, More more >
  Topics: Features , Culture and Lifestyle, Food and Cooking, Foods,  More more >
| More

 Friends' Activity   Popular   Most Viewed 
[ 02/14 ]   The Addams Family  @ Shubert Theatre
[ 02/14 ]   "Aphrodite and the Gods of Love"  @ Museum of Fine Arts
[ 02/14 ]   "Processes and Dreams"  @ Panopticon Gallery
ARTICLES BY PETER KEOUGH
Share this entry with Delicious
  •   REVIEW: THE OSCAR NOMINATED SHORT FILMS 2012: DOCUMENTARY  |  February 10, 2012
    The films in this program contain some of the most powerful images to be seen on the screen this year.
  •   REVIEW: JOURNEY 2: THE MYSTERIOUS ISLAND  |  February 07, 2012
    I liked the tiny elephants and the Rock bouncing berries off his pecs, but Brad Peyton's sequel is as bad as the 2008 original.
  •   REVIEW: CHRONICLE  |  February 02, 2012
    Poor Andrew (Dane DeHaan) has more problems than any movie teenager deserves.
  •   REVIEW: ONE FOR THE MONEY  |  January 31, 2012
    TV director Julie Anne Robinson's insipid adaptation of this first volume in Janet Evanovich's Stephanie Plum series has more in common with Young Adult than with the average gumshoe yarn.
  •   REVIEW: BIG MIRACLE  |  January 31, 2012
    Taking a tip from the oil industry, Hollywood has started exploiting Alaska. Following in the tracks of The Grey is Ken Kwapis's take on a true story from 1988 about an effort to save gray whales trapped in the Arctic ice. Surprisingly, the film offers genuine complexity.

 See all articles by: PETER KEOUGH

MOST POPULAR
RSS Feed of for the most popular articles
 Most Viewed   Most Emailed