Rookies Go Bust

DeLeo and Baker were bested in Beacon Hill's gaming showdown, not so Cahill
By DAVID S. BERNSTEIN  |  August 4, 2010


The end of the two-year Massachusetts legislative session frequently turns into a high-stakes poker game, with the governor, Senate president, and House speaker bluffing and bargaining down to the wire — along with lobbyists, interest groups, and, in election years, candidates for state office kibitzing from the sidelines.

That was the case as the 2009-'10 session wound down last week.

A stack of proposed laws, ranging from school nutrition to economic development, needed to get done by the Saturday deadline. But those bills were held hostage, as bargaining chips in the showdown between House and Senate over the details of an expanded-gaming bill.

In the end, many of those other bills passed — but the gaming bill failed to become law, at least as of this writing.

After the House and Senate finally agreed on a bill which included two slots licenses for race tracks, Governor Deval Patrick sent it back to them with an amendment to remove those licenses. With the session already ended, the bill is likely to expire.

Just as there is no substitute for experience in poker, in this political game the ones who came out ahead were those who have been through the action before.

Governor Deval Patrick and Senate President Therese Murray, by now at ease with the intensity of the pressure, came away with most of their agendas fulfilled.

Things did not end so well for new Speaker Robert DeLeo, navigating the end-of-session maneuvers for the first time. His one and only apparent priority — slots for race tracks — is the one thing that clearly isn't going to happen this year.

"It's a big hit to DeLeo," says one Beacon Hill operative. "Murray has become the more dominant player — this session showed that."

Experience showed in the gubernatorial candidates as well. Tim Cahill, who as treasurer since 2002 has tussled in plenty of these types of backroom Beacon Hill battles, emerged as the clear champion of casino and racino supporters; there is even speculation now that he could win some key trade-union endorsements because of it.

By contrast, Republican Charles Baker has been outside the State House for over a decade, and never led a strategic political fight there. His position on gaming hewed too closely to Patrick's — supporting limited expansion, but opposing the house proposal as excessive. That left him poorly positioned, compared with Cahill, to make hay out of Patrick's failure to get a casino bill passed.

All of this is contrary to what might have been expected as the session began, at the start of 2009. Back then, Patrick and Murray seemed to have the most to lose if no casino bill passed. After all, it was Patrick who originally pushed for casinos, and fought hard while losing two years ago to then-speaker Sal DiMasi. And it was Murray who back in early 2009 promised passage of a casino bill this session — infamously punctuating the vow with a loud "ka-ching!"

But more recently, both the governor and Senate president have de-emphasized the importance of casinos, instead talking up other legislation — particularly bills addressing economic development, health-care costs, criminal-offender records information (CORI), and foreclosure protection.

1  |  2  |  3  |  4  |   next >
Related: From the penitentiary to the presidential race, it’s our annual Memorial Day roast of Massachusetts pols, State of flux, The Third Annual Phoenix Memorial Day look at the laughable state of Massachusetts politics, More more >
  Topics: Talking Politics , Deval Patrick, Tim Cahill, Therese Murray,  More more >
| More

Most Popular
Share this entry with Delicious
  •   MRS. WARREN GOES TO WASHINGTON  |  March 21, 2013
    Elizabeth Warren was the only senator on the Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions (HELP) Committee, aside from the chair and ranking minority, to show up at last Thursday's hearing on indexing the minimum wage to inflation.
  •   MARCH MADNESS  |  March 12, 2013
    It's no surprise that the coming weekend's Saint Patrick's Day celebrations have become politically charged, given the extraordinary convergence of electoral events visiting South Boston.
  •   LABOR'S LOVE LOST  |  March 08, 2013
    Steve Lynch is winning back much of the union support that left him in 2009.
  •   AFTER MARKEY, GET SET, GO  |  February 20, 2013
    It's a matter of political decorum: when an officeholder is running for higher office, you wait until the election has been won before publicly coveting the resulting vacancy.
    It wasn't just that Scott Brown announced he was not running in the special US Senate election — it was that it quickly became evident that he was not handing the job off to another Republican.

 See all articles by: DAVID S. BERNSTEIN