Hollywood bribes us with thongs

Swag alert
By PETER KEOUGH  |  July 5, 2006

Aside from the bag of Burger King Kids Meals toys I got at the Superman Returns junket (disappointing, to say the least), it’s been ages since I’ve gotten promo items from a movie studio. Forget the dozen or so films they haven’t screened for us so far this year. No matter the proliferation of fan boys’ blurbs on the ads. What really makes me afraid that critics are history is when they don’t even try to cloud our minds with childish crap.

So I was pleased and, as usual, suspicious when I received a UPS Express envelope from Fox’s marketing department last week. Inside, I found a pair of stills for an upcoming movie entitled John Tucker Must Die, and a white, lacy woman’s thong. I’m no expert in such matters, but the latter seemed to me a quality item (it had small embroidered blue and yellow flowers).

Common sense would say: don’t look a gift horse in the mouth. Just appreciate it. But I know better. These things are a form of communication, a message from Them, the studios, to Us, the lowly working press.

For clues, I examined the thong. Attached to it was a tag with an illustration of a young woman wearing a T-shirt on which was printed DON’T GET MAD. GET EVEN. She had a tattoo of the film’s name on her lower back and was wearing a pair of white cotton underpants. She was not wearing the thong in question.
I then checked out the stills. Shirtless schoolboys, thongs evident above their shorts (“whale tail,” I believe it’s called), are lined up on a basketball court. The caption: JOHN TUCKER (JESSE METCALFE), CAPTAIN OF THE HIGH SCHOOL BASKETBALL TEAM, CONVINCES HIS PLAYERS THAT WEARING A THONG WILL HELP SHARPEN THEIR GAME IN JOHN TUCKER MUST DIE.

For that, he must die? Why? If I donned the thong, would it “sharpen my game”? Would I die? Clearly, they are trying to lure us, the critics, into putting it on. For our few female colleagues, it would perhaps not be inappropriate. But for the men? Not that a lot of us would need our arms twisted to try it, but I fear it may be some form of entrapment, luring critics into a taboo act with promises of a “sharper game,” or daring us with threats of death, and then revealing some of us as the fat-assed idiots we really are.

I’m troubled. But I’m still glad I got it.

Related: John Tucker Must Die, Film @ Noir, Crossword: ''The worst of 2007'', More more >
  Topics: This Just In , Entertainment, Sports, Movies,  More more >
| More


Most Popular
ARTICLES BY PETER KEOUGH
Share this entry with Delicious
  •   BUFFET DINING: THE 15TH BOSTON UNDERGROUND FILM FESTIVAL  |  March 19, 2013
    "Copraphagy" is a key word at this year's Boston Underground Film Festival at the Brattle.
  •   REVIEW: GINGER & ROSA  |  March 19, 2013
    Sally Potter likes to mess around with form and narrative.
  •   UNDERGROUND CINEMA: THE 12TH BOSTON TURKISH FILM FESTIVAL  |  March 12, 2013
    This year's Boston Turkish Film Festival includes works in which directors ponder the relationships between the secular and the religious, between men and women, and between destiny and identity.
  •   REVIEW: A GLIMPSE INSIDE THE MIND OF CHARLES SWAN III  |  March 12, 2013
    In Roman Coppola's sophomoric second feature (his 2001 debut CQ was promising), Charlie Sheen shows restraint as the titular asshole, a dissolute ad designer and solipsistic whiner who's mooning over the loss of his latest love.
  •   REVIEW: UPSIDE DOWN  |  March 14, 2013
    Had Ed Wood Jr. directed Fritz Lang's Metropolis , he couldn't have achieved the earnest dopiness of Juan Solanas's sci-fi allegory — nor the striking images.

 See all articles by: PETER KEOUGH