Don't oversimplify the GateHouse fight

The beginning of the end of Fenway?

GateHouse vs. the Globe: Yes, it's on

7 Comments

• Appalled said:

  I am in no way an expert, proponent or even pretend to understand the blogsphere rules and regulations but I think that Boston.com and the Globe, let's call a spade a spade have taken embarrassing yourself to new levels.

  To pass off mostly GateHouse materials as their new local journalism and sell ads around it is the most despicible thing to come out of that crap hole on Morressey Blvd. in years.

  I am sure that they had many a conference call with their lawyers who assured them that ripping off Gate House on the Web could be done legally and on the cheap. Another example of lazy journalism that dosen't help, inform or better anyone but themselves.....

  Bravo you jack asses!!!

  December 23, 2008 3:35 PM

• Ryan said:

  Very, very good explanation. I wasn't paying much attention to this whole story - and you summed it up quite nicely.

  This is probably the lowest moment of the Globe in terms of journalistic standards. It's stealing and I hope GateHouse wins. The sooner the Globe's sold, the better.

  December 24, 2008 5:09 AM

• Chuck T said:

  Very well said. I've noticed some changing habits lately about aggregation: they don't drive that much traffic. People get what they need from whatever source they're reading and that's it. It takes a "touch" to actually drive traffic from one site to another, people tend to be lazy and will just read where they are.

  The Globe's site acts more as a scanning tool, giving you a quick snapshot of what's in Newton. It doesn't encourage the linking the way that Google does. It also doesn't add anything to the overall "conversation" about the city the way that Gaffin and Universal Hub adds to the Boston discussion.

  December 24, 2008 7:31 AM

• Tim Allik said:

  Aggregation isn't a sound business model. Aggregation is a commodity. There is no "wide moat" around this idea. In fact there isn't a moat at all. Using an RSS reader and a few search terms achieves virtually the same thing.

  Boston.com's new Your Town sections are a laudable first step in the right direction -- but the site would be better off by launching a local blog network with a shared revenue model. Boston.com could leverage its reach and traffic to the benefit of its blog partners in a way that smaller competitors could not (the moat). Bloggers' compensation would be tied directly to pageviews, an incentive model that New York Times property About.com has used and is using successfully.  

  By giving bloggers in this network special opportunities to integrate Boston.com content on their own websites with widgets and links, Boston.com would also benefit from broader  distribution and better search engine optimization.

  December 30, 2008 2:08 PM

Leave a Comment