Stable — within limits - News

Stable — within limits

Clinton’s dominated the Democratic field since february, but voters are getting used to Obama

August 29, 2007 4:25:52 PM

There’s been very little movement in state and national Democratic polls over the past six months — a testament to the strength of front-runners Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama. Clearly, it’s going to be tough to challenge either from back in the pack.

Movement within the GOP ranks, on the other hand, has been relatively fluid. But perhaps the more important difference between the two races is the calendars they’ll face during the primary’s first month.

This past weekend, the Democratic National Committee announced it would strip Florida — which had sought to schedule its ’08 Democratic primary on January 29 — of its delegates if that state holds a binding primary before February 5. (Presumably the same thing would happen to Michigan if it attempts to move its voting up to January.) For now, that decision seems to concentrate the Democratic field on Iowa (January 14), New Hampshire (January 22), and South Carolina (January 29), with the January 19 Nevada caucus getting minimal attention. In contrast, the GOP currently seems inclined to let South Carolina move to the middle of January and Florida to the end of January, with Michigan possibly in there too.

Holding Florida and Michigan’s contests early would have helped Clinton, since it would have been difficult for Obama or Edwards to challenge her lead in first-month, mega-state races requiring wholesale politics. As it stands now, though, both have a shot at derailing the front-runner before Super Tuesday in three smaller, distinctly differing states.

If Clinton wins all three of these initial contests, the race is obviously over. But right now, her poll numbers in each are sharply lower than they are nationally. January is going to be very interesting, indeed.

In any event, here’s where things stand now for the Democrats as summer starts to wind down. (For our companion pre–Labor Day rundown of the GOP hopefuls, see “White Elephants,” News and Features, August 24.)

Braying for a victory
BARACK OBAMA: THE COME-FROM-BEHIND CHOICE Yes, we know that no one else seems to consider him the Dems’ likeliest choice. And yes, he’s made a few rookie mistakes (to be expected), and he’s lost a bit of sparkle during his debate performances. But he’s hoping the flip side of his ever-presence is that voters are gradually becoming accustomed to him, and that, as a more familiar face, he’ll seem less inexperienced. He still has tons of cash, heavy institutional support in the black community, and a lot of energy through his support among the young. No one should underestimate him.

HILLARY CLINTON: THE PACESETTER She’s run a mistake-free campaign so far. And she is the consensus front-runner — in the polls and among the punditry. But voters have yet to really face the two issues confronting the Clinton candidacy: do they want to relive the Clinton years? And, do they want to nominate a candidate whose chances of winning a general election are thus impaired? Until the contests actually begin, we won’t know if voters are going to swallow their doubts and take a chance on Clinton. The guess here is that at the moment of truth, they’ll blink.

JOHN EDWARDS: THE CHALLENGER Edwards retains the problem he had when he announced. No matter how many times he reinvents himself or moves to the left, he still needs to do well in an early state other than Iowa. And even the Hawkeye state, a must win for him, is hardly looking to be a sure thing. Ultimately, Edwards has depended on the possibility of Clinton or Obama stumbling, leaving him the alternative to the survivor. The problem is that neither Obama nor Clinton looks likely to do a quick fade. Edwards may be the odd one out.

BILL RICHARDSON: THE LONG SHOT Richardson has run an effective race. Unfortunately, he’s not a terribly effective candidate. True, his debate performances, though hardly stellar, have been better than expected. But any candidate who can’t stand up to Tim Russert on Meet the Press (Richardson put in what may be the worst appearance by a guest in decades) is going to have a hard time facing up to Vladimir Putin and the rest. It’s impossible to see how he breaks into the second tier, since even his strongest state, Nevada, doesn’t count for much. He’ll be gone before Super Tuesday.

JOE BIDEN: FRANCIS THE TALKING MULE A Biden victory was always a remote possibility, but he could have used his one asset — his considerable experience — to distinguish himself from the three leaders. He also could have taken a page out of the Romney playbook and spent his money early in an attempt to become known. Instead, he’s seemed content to kind of sneer his way through the debates and not do much else. Consequently, he’s done.

CHRIS DODD: THE VETERAN A terribly nice and able guy who isn’t going to advance toward the White House. He should save himself embarrassment and withdraw now.

DENNIS KUCINICH: THE JACKASS Kucinich is on an ego trip. If he really cared about the issues he professes to champion, he’d get behind a candidate with similar concerns (probably Edwards; perhaps Obama) who has a real chance to win. Instead, he takes up space in the field and on the debate stage, draining energy from the other liberals. Thus, all he does is help Clinton. Thanks, but no thanks, Dennis.

MIKE GRAVEL: THE GLUE FACTORY What else is there to say?

On the Web
The Presidential Tote Board blog: //www.thephoenix.com/toteboard