Moonsigns  |  BandGuide  |  Blogs  |  Adult
Boston  |  Portland  |  Providence
 

Bakst reportedly taking buyout

As I reported last week, ProJo political columnis M. Charles Bakst had previously been considering retiring next year, so it's not a big surprise that, according to Channel 10, he has elected to take the latest buyout at the newspaper. The big question now becomes whether the Journal will maintain its political column.

The longtime political columnist for The Providence Journal is retiring.

M. Charles Bakst is taking a buyout that was recently offered to a number of Journal employees.

For the past 40 years, Bakst has written weekly and Sunday columns for the newspaper. He also served as State House bureau chief.

He is known for skewering high-ranking politicians from both parties.

Bakst's last day at The Providence Journal will be Sept. 12.

  • joe bernstein said:

    Does the buyout include gift certificates to buffet joints?

    August 6, 2008 10:26 AM
  • rhody said:

      Or a pack of No-Doz?

    August 6, 2008 11:24 AM
  • Will said:

    Speaking of buffets, I was at Bob Watson's fundraiser last night in East Greewich, and who do I see at the table munching away with abandon in a wrinkly pseudo-WASP seersucker suit (use your imagination) other than Charlie "Can't leave the Projo soon enough" Bakst.

    Anyway, I overheard him (not that I was making any special effort to listen in) talking to several folks about "my retirement" in very clear and unambiguous terms -- so stick a fork in him, he's done, good riddens. Don't let the door hit you in the arse on the way out!

    August 6, 2008 12:07 PM
  • joe bernstein said:

    Thanks Will the image of Charley gobbling down chopped liver in a seersucker suit just caused me to spit coffee on the keyboard :))

    August 6, 2008 12:32 PM
  • Tom said:

    I have known M Charles for more than 20 years.  He may not be the most exciting or charismatic journo on the planet but he is one of the most dogged and conscientious in his field.  He really cares about RI and the hypocrisy that more often than not passes for its politics.  It's unfortunate that the previous writers ( Joe Bernstein and Will )focus less on Charlie's professional ability and more about his "sartorial" appearance.  Will...look it up and while you're at it...the word is riddance as in good riddance.  Charlie...you are one of a kind and while many in the political world will be happy to see you go...those that truly care about RI politics and serious journalism realize what a loss your retirement will be.

    August 6, 2008 4:58 PM
  • Ian Donnis said:

    I agree that Charlie has made an important contribution. Charlie is a class act in my book.

    August 6, 2008 6:39 PM
  • joe bernstein said:

    Ian-you're too much.You are johnny on the spot to replyt to wiseass remarks like I've made above.On another thread you took one "Mary" to task for rude comments about Obama(He definitely is not "ghetto")I then replied in a completely serious tone and made specific points.Total silence.If you think I was wrong,just say so and point out why.I'm a big boy and don't sweat criticism-valid or not.As it stands my assertion on that thread is unchallenged.  

    August 6, 2008 7:35 PM
  • rhody said:

      In this political environment, whoever takes over that column is going to be wearing the same bullseye on his or her back that Merrill has, even if they look GQ or earn Miss Manners' gold star.

    August 7, 2008 12:40 AM
  • joe bernstein said:

    I bet Kathy Gregg could do it,because she lacks the empty arrogance of Charlie-I don't always agree with her,but she doesn't pontificate  like this loser did.

    August 7, 2008 5:06 AM
  • Jim Taricani said:

    Whether you agreed with Charlie is not the issue. His columns added to the public discourse, and when we start subtracting from that, whether it be a liberal or conservative point of view, we are losing the free exchange of ideas our Founding Fathers so cherished.

    I was here when he was a state house reporter, doing straight news-and he was one of the best-fair and tough and a damn good reporter.

    August 7, 2008 8:14 AM
  • joe bernstein said:

    Okay Jim-since you are an investigative reporter and generally,although not always, are pretty accurate with the facts underlying your stories,don't you concede that when Charlie got into this immigration issue he made wild allegations and incited emotion driven responses rather than learn the facts first hand?I was a professional in the field of immigration enforcement for almost 21 years and Charlie ,to my knowledge never in all that time undertook to educate himself in the nuts and bolts of the situation.Kevin O'Connor of the Pawtucket Times certainly did.Lee Dykas of the Journal also covered immigration operations dispassionately and accurately.You got involved on an occasion or two,as I recall you in our office,although we never spoke and I forget what it was you were there about.Charlie may be a columnist,but that is no excuse for polemics vilifying people doing a hard job mandated by Federal law.His de facto portrayal of ICE agents as somehow akin to the Gestapo was slanderous.I don't give a hoot in hell for his political coverage in general-maybe he knew the territory in the Statehouse better than he knew immigration issues.I sure hope so.His ambush of Sue Carcieri reeked,and frankly the few times I've met Charlie I was sure I wouldn't want to spend any time around him.

    Many years ago in Chicago an investigative reporter for one of the networks,I believe ABC, by the name of Roberta Baskin came to INS with two separate stories she was developing-one concerned with voter fraud involving illegal aliens and the other to do with corrupt state employees supplying drivers licenses to illegal aliens(sound familiar?)and the INS acted on her information.Both investigations resulted in dozens of convictions and in the case of the state employees over 20 were convicted and 13 driving schools were shut down.Roberta Baskin took the time to learn the terrain  and knew when she was in over her head and did the right thing.

    i also had a DesMoines Register reporter as a ride along for a while and he submitted accurate realistic stories.I am telling you this because I have no vendetta with the media.I only ask that they do their job fairly and ethically.I don't think Charlie made the grade with relation to the matter of immigraton enforcement.

    August 7, 2008 10:22 AM
  • joe bernstein said:

    Jim-as an investigative reporter Iam sure you research the facts thoroughly before going with a story.I have found your stories to be usually,with an exception here and there,responsibly done and valid.No one is perfect.

    Tat said,Charlie got into the immigration issue with apparently no hard facts at his disposal because he didn't take the time or effort to find them out.Being a columnist is no excuse for vilifying people and suggesting they are de facto Gestapo gents because they do a hard job mandated by Federal law.

    i recall that in past years you were in the INs office a few times.I was an agent for almost 21 years,12 in Providence.We never spoke,but I assume you educated yourself on whatever it was you were there about before going with a story.

    I have no axe to grind with the media.Kevin O'Connor of the Pawtucket Times and Lee Dykas of the Journal reported fairly and accurately on immigration enforcement activities for years.

    When I was assigned to Chicago Roberta Baskin of ABC did investigative reports of great depth and accuracy on this issue.She came to INS first with her informtion and reported on the investigations after they were prosecuted.One involved voter fraud using illegal aliens.The other involved corrupt state employees issuing licenses to illegals(sound familiar?).Over 20 employees were arrested and 13 driving schools shut down.She knew her information involved serious felonies and acted responsibly.

    I also had a ride-along reporter from the Des Moines Register for awhile.He wrote accurate accounts of what he saw and heard.

    Maybe Charlie was a fount of knowledge about statehouse politics,I'll take your word for it,but he knows next to nothing about the real world of illegal aliens.This hasn't stopped him from demagoguery disguised as opinion.

    I met Charlie a time or two,very briefly,and we don't know each other on a name basis.I didn't like him right off the bat,to be perfectly honest.

    His extreme liberal point of view turns me off.But what really bothers me is his irresponsibility in inflaming passions on a false basis vis a vis the immigration issue.

    While we are on the subject your colleague Bill Rappleye ought to look up the term "undocumented citizen" he used on tv-ain't no such critter.

    To be fair,Jim I have found your reporting on immigration issues to be evenhanded and accurate in most cases.

    August 7, 2008 11:04 AM
  • Jim Taricani said:

    Joe: I agree with you on the illegal immigration issue. although I don't recall meeting you, I know of your excellent reputation. I spend a lot of time with law enforcement. I was a military policeman 4 years in the Air Force and worked my way through college doing P.I. work.

    I often times didn't agree with Charlie, but I was just pointing out that it's not bad to have a lot of points of view for public discussion.

    From both the right and the left, there seems, with some people, that they only want to hear the point of view that fits thier own.

    I enjoy listening to you on Dan's show. On the illegal aliens issue, you are one of the few that make very good sense.

    August 7, 2008 11:27 AM
  • joe bernstein said:

    You're right Jim-we didn't get introduced -I think maybe you were interviewing SA Mark Furtado about a fraud case he was working now that I think more about it.Furtado is now the RAC in New Hampshire.

    Sorry for the double post-I thought I had somehow deleted the first one.

    I actually didn't go after Charlie about his statehouse reporting because I know nothing about statehouse politics and read less about it.

    Thanks for the compliment-on issues other than immigration I can on occasion sound like a nitwit.

    August 7, 2008 11:53 AM
  • Jim Taricani said:

    Yeah, I think it was Furtado. I'm trying to work up an investigative piece about illegals working in the finer restaurants in Rhode Island..I know of a few....hope it works out.

    August 7, 2008 12:03 PM
  • Jim Taricani said:

    Yeah, I think it was Furtado. I'm trying to work up an investigative piece about illegals working in the finer restaurants in Rhode Island..I know of a few....hope it works out.

    August 7, 2008 12:03 PM
  • Jim Taricani said:

    Yeah, I think it was Furtado. I'm trying to work up an investigative piece about illegals working in the finer restaurants in Rhode Island..I know of a few....hope it works out.

    August 7, 2008 12:03 PM
  • Jim Taricani said:

    Yeah, it was Furtado. I'm working up a piece on the numerous illegals that work in some of the finer restaurants in Rhode Island..could be interesting if I can get it..

    August 7, 2008 12:08 PM
  • joe bernstein said:

    We used to get an enormous number of illegal aliens working in the restaurants in the Chicago area,including a fair number with active TB.In Rhode Island it wasn't that prevalent,mainly due to the overwhelming presence of Johnson & Wales providing so much manpower in that field.Offhand i can recall one case of a Chinese restaurant prosecuted for harboring,but that was about it.i spent 90%of my time on criminal/drug violators.

    August 7, 2008 1:55 PM

Leave a Comment

Login | Not a member yet? Click here to Join

(required)  
(optional)
(required)  
ABOUT THIS BLOG
SUBSCRIBE






Monday, October 13, 2008  |  Sign In  |  Register
 
thePhoenix.com:
Phoenix Media/Communications Group:
TODAY'S FEATURED ADVERTISERS
Copyright © 2008 The Phoenix Media/Communications Group