Cute-overload alert: Cambridge, co-op's ducks in a row
Last September, New Yorker staffwriter (and former Phoenix staffer ) Susan Orlean laid out the case for keeping fresh poultry in the backyard : it's cheap, it's safe, it's fun, and it's environmentally sound. You would think that would be enough for the city fathers of Cambridge, Massachusetts.
Apparently not. A Cambridge co-op that keeps ducks and hens as pets is concerned that the People's Republic may be preparing to ban their feathered friends: three ducks named Potassium, Ferdinand, and Penelope (that's them in the photo, above), and two chickens named Henrietta and Frances. The co-op's eight residents, who describe themselves as "working professionals, teachers, artists, entrepreneurs, and students," are circulating an online petition to declare that:
We, residents of Cambridge, Massachusetts, believe it should be within
the right of the residents of 218/220 Putnam Avenue as well as other
backyard chicken or fowl keepers in Cambridge to responsibly keep a
reasonable number of hens on their residential property.
They've also grabbed a nifty URL and launched savetheducks.org , which debunks many of their neighbors' concerns, as collected under such lascivious headings such as "OUR BIRDS ARE CLEAN " (complete with links to each fowl's health certificate) and "THERE ARE NO RATS ."
If Cambridge residents remain unconvinced by empirical arguments, the Cambridge Eight have wisely uploaded a bunch of videos to YouTube showing their ducks in an advanced state of AWWWWWWWWW :
(Perhaps wisely, they don't link from the site to this NSFW video shot of the ducks in flagrante .)
[Link-tip o' the hat to Universal Hub ]