The Phoenix Network:
 
 
 
About  |  Advertise
Adult  |  Moonsigns  |  Band Guide  |  Blogs  |  In Pictures
 
Media -- Dont Quote Me  |  News Features  |  Talking Politics

Boston's $10 Million Boo-Boos

Righting a wrongful conviction
By DAVID S. BERNSTEIN  |  July 7, 2009

Anthony_Powell_conviction_main

The bill continues to come due for the string of nine wrongful convictions discovered in Boston between 1999 and 2004 — a tab that has now topped $10 million in court settlements.

The Boston Phoenix has learned that the city of Boston paid $3.8 million in December to settle a civil lawsuit brought by Anthony Powell, who spent more than 12 years in prison for a rape and kidnapping he did not commit. This is the third, and largest, settlement so far from these cases: the city previously paid $3.2 million each to Neil Miller and Stephan Cowans.

Powell was convicted in 1992 of attacking a woman at knifepoint in Roxbury. He was released in 2004, after DNA testing proved his innocence. The December settlement is in addition to $500,000 awarded to Powell under the state's wrongful-conviction compensation law.

Several other wrongful-conviction suits against the city are still pending, including those of Ulysses Rodriguez Charles, Laurence Adams, and Angel Toro. Shawn Drumgold, perhaps the best-known of the cases, is nearing trial in the second phase of his complicated action against the city and several individual officers. In another case, the city prevailed when a jury ruled that police did not violate the civil rights of Donnell Johnson.

Powell and his attorneys declined to discuss the settlement with the Phoenix, which discovered the settlement amount through a public-information request. The city's corporate counsel, William Sinnott, cited a confidentiality agreement, but said that, "In general terms, we've got a universe of cases we've been dealing with over the past couple of years, and we try to deal with them fairly." He added that the city feels that it has an added obligation in cases like Powell's, where "actual innocence" has been determined through DNA testing.

In court documents and previous interviews, Powell's attorneys have claimed that Boston police officers committed a series of sins in their rush to pin the crime on him: they pressured the victim into identifying Powell, even though he did not match her description; they ignored hairs that they knew did not match Powell's; and they failed to check other evidence.

With the city choosing to settle before trial, the question of whether this was a case of alleged negligence or worse will remain a matter of dispute. As in the other wrongful-conviction cases, the city and the Boston Police Department have not admitted to any wrongdoing. But perhaps the most troubling aspect of Powell's conviction was who didn't get caught.

Even before Powell's conviction, there was reason to suspect that two other attacks — including one that took place after Powell had been jailed — were committed by the same rapist. That could have been confirmed through DNA testing, which was not conducted. After Powell's exoneration, the link between those rapes was confirmed, as was a fourth, committed in 1999.

Last year — just a few months before the city settled Powell's lawsuit — Suffolk County prosecutors charged one Jerry Dixon with the rapes, based on a DNA match. The pursuit of Powell, despite evidence of his innocence, may have prevented police from getting Dixon off the streets earlier, some local observers contend.

Stephen Hrones, the attorney who helped free Powell, adds that the case holds another lesson: the need for a state law governing post-conviction DNA testing .

1  |  2  |   next >
Related: Patriots daze, Right-wing terror, Robojudge, More more >
  Topics: This Just In , Criminal Trials, Trials, Boston Police Department,  More more >
  • Share:
  • Share this entry with Facebook
  • Share this entry with Digg
  • Share this entry with Delicious
  • RSS feed
  • Email this article to a friend
  • Print this article
Comments
Re: Boston's $10 Million Boo-Boos
Bernstein says that "In Powell's case, the Suffolk County DA agreed to turn over the evidence," as if, in other cases, the Suffolk County DA has not.  In fact, as Bernstein knows very well, it was District Attorney Conley who made it a policy not to oppose post-conviction DNA testing for relevant evidence.  Stephen Hrones knows this as well and has lauded the policy for what it is -- an affirmative, permanent, and uniformly-applied protocol with the specific intent of reducing the likelihood of a wrongful conviction to the smallest degree possible in a human endeavor like the criminal justice system.
By jakewark on 07/01/2009 at 5:12:39
Re: Boston's $10 Million Boo-Boos
No, Jake, that's not the implication of Bernstein's statement, as it is immediately followed by "in other Massachusetts incidents [as opposed to Suffolk county/Boston incidents], that has not been the case." And it's lovely that Conley has such a just policy- but there should be legal requirements and safeguards for this kind of thing, so they are not to be decided at the whim of a particular DA. Conley will not be Suffolk DA forever, nor is he DA for all of Massachusetts. I take it you oppose legislative intervention and are untroubled by these types of multi-million dollar settlements?
By Farnkoff on 07/02/2009 at 9:41:44
Re: Boston's $10 Million Boo-Boos
In an ironic twist, the Boston Police Dept and two of its officers and families have been unfortunate secondary victims in the wrongful convictions in the Roslindale Bomb cases of 1993.  Through an agreement with Suffolk DA Dan Conley's predecessors, the ATF led the investigation and the U.S. Attorney for Massachusetts prosecuted Thomas A. Shay and Alfred Trenkler for building the bomb that killed Boston Bomb Squad officer Jeremiah Hurley and maimed his partner, Francis Foley.   As the Boston Police Dept and the Boston legal community is slowly coming to realize, both Trenkler and Shay are "perfectly innocent," as is explained in my online book, "Perfectly Innocent" on the website www.alfredtrenklerinnocent.org. In this case, it is the Boston Police Dept. and the Hurley and Foley families which deserve justice, along with Trenkler and Shay.     It is hoped that the new, to-be-confirmed, U.S. Attorney for Massachusetts, Carmen Ortiz, will act as forthrightly as Dan Conley has with claims of wrongful conviction, and will closely examine the claims of wrongful conviction in the Roslindale Bomb cases.  Of the first five of Trenkler's jurors I was able to contact, four of them read my book and all five wrote to Judge Rya Zobel to disavow their 1993 guilty verdict and ask for a retrial.  Judge Zobel has chosen, or felt bound by judicial rules, so far, to ignore the growing tide of truth in this case, but Ms. Ortiz has more flexibility.  She can launch, or simply approve, a preliminary re-investigation of the case, where it can be shown that the case against Alfred Trenkler was a house of cards, each of which was unbelievable, unreliable or untrue.     One such "card" was an inmate informant with a nickname in the Federal prison system of "little stories" who was brought from Texas to Massachusetts and coincidentally placed in the same Intake Unit as Trenkler and who miraculously produced from a few minutes of conversation over three days a confession by Trenkler to the crimes. Other "cards" were people who wanted favors from the police and U.S. Attorney and whose testimony came to fit the Government's theory of the case.    Alfred Trenkler and Thomas A. Shay should be exonerated in 2009 as they had absolutely nothing to do with the Roslindale Bomb. They are "actually innocent."  Every day of wrongful imprisonment for these men is a tragedy.  Upon their exoneration, the Federal Government, and not Boston or Suffolk County, will be responsible for compensation for their wrongful convictions.  
By MorrisonBonpasse on 07/04/2009 at 8:55:09
Re: Boston's $10 Million Boo-Boos
Why would you suggest that I was opposed to post-conviction DNA testing when I immediately went to bat for it?
By jakewark on 07/28/2009 at 5:14:21

Today's Event Picks
ARTICLES BY DAVID S. BERNSTEIN
Share this entry with Delicious
  •   THE QUIET STORM  |  November 04, 2009
    In recent weeks, Governor Deval Patrick has been receiving some of his best press in a long time — which is to say, he’s gotten very little coverage at all.
  •   TAKING SIDES  |  November 04, 2009
    The stakes are high in the battle for Massachusetts’s first new US senatorship in a quarter-century.
  •   HOLDING HIS PUNCHES  |  October 21, 2009
    All year, Boston’s political observers have been watching for signs of an anti-Menino tipping point in the mayoral race.
  •   KHAZEI, LIKE A FOX?  |  October 16, 2009
    If there is to be a candidate in the Massachusetts US Senate race who inspires the sort of grassroots, progressive following that propelled Governor Deval Patrick into office three years ago — an insurgent candidacy, if you will — it figures to be idealistic public-service advocate Alan Khazei, co-founder of City Year and founder of Be the Change, Inc.
  •   FINAL FOUR?  |  September 30, 2009
    Some of Boston's savviest political insiders were confident of one thing going into last week's preliminary election: the top four finishers in the at-large City Council race would not be the same quartet to actually win those four seats in November.

 See all articles by: DAVID S. BERNSTEIN

MOST POPULAR
RSS Feed of for the most popular articles
 Most Viewed   Most Emailed 



  |  Sign In  |  Register
 
thePhoenix.com:
Phoenix Media/Communications Group:
TODAY'S FEATURED ADVERTISERS
Copyright © 2009 The Phoenix Media/Communications Group