The Phoenix Network:
 
 
 
About  |  Advertise
 
Letters  |  Media -- Dont Quote Me  |  News Features  |  Talking Politics  |  The Editorial Page  |  This Just In

Tabloid dreams

Can Kevin Convey rescue the Herald ?
By ADAM REILLY  |  November 30, 2006

061201_quote_main
On Monday afternoon, the Boston Herald announced a major change to the paper’s masthead. Ken Chandler, the combative Rupert Murdoch protégé who’s run the paper since 2004 — and who once said he’d kill himself if he put out a paper as boring as the Globe — is leaving at the end of the year to start a consulting business in New York (named, inventively, ChandlerMedia). His replacement? Kevin Convey, a grizzled Herald veteran who’s currently the paper’s managing editor.

In a Herald story that ran the next day, Convey vowed the paper would respond to major industry-wide challenges — falling circulation, dwindling ad revenues, the rise of the Web — “like we do everything else. We’ll work our butts off, we’ll work smarter than the other guys and we have a brand that people really like and identify with. We’ve got a cadre of readers that will follow us wherever we go.” Good stuff, if you’re looking to rally the troops. But not necessarily a mindset that will help Convey — who’s held in high esteem by colleagues and competitors alike — reverse the Herald’s precipitous slide.

Herald Square blues
These are dark days in the newspaper business as a whole, but things are especially grim over at Herald Square. In May, Herald publisher Pat Purcell sold Community Newspaper Company (CNC), a group of 100-some smaller Massachusetts publications, to Illinois-based Liberty Group Publishing. The deal helped Purcell clear his debts; unfortunately, it also signaled that potential investors have precious little interest in the Herald.

Earlier this year, meanwhile, Purcell broached the possibility of a joint printing venture with the New York Times Company, owner of the hated Globe, only to be rebuffed — an experience that can’t have been pleasant. And earlier this month, Globe columnist Steve Bailey reported that the revenue from four new Herald-sited billboards will go to Purcell’s family, not to the paper. That would have been awkward under the best of circumstances, but it was all the more so with Herald employees still weighing whether to accept a two-year wage freeze proposed by management earlier this year. (The proposal has been accepted by the paper’s editorial employees, but the business side has yet to sign on.)

Meanwhile, the Herald’s circulation continues to hemorrhage, faster than the Globe’s and way faster than the national average. In the six-month period ending September 30, according to the Audit Bureau of Circulations, the Herald’s daily circulation fell 12 percent (from 230,000 to 203,000) while its Sunday circulation dropped 13 percent (from 132,000 to 115,000). The average national decline in daily and Sunday circulation for this period was 2.8 and 3.4 percent; in the same six months, the Globe’s daily and Sunday circulations dropped 7 and 10 percent, respectively, to 386,000 and 587,000. While both papers have cause for concern, the Globe is owned (for now) by the Times Company, which can lean on revenues from the Times. Purcell doesn’t have this luxury.

The Herald’s staffing numbers are equally dispiriting. With political reporter Kim Atkins relocating to Washington, DC, and business columnist Brett Arends leaving to write a mutual-funds column for TheStreet.com, the Herald’s roster of reporters and columnists is slimmer than at any time in recent memory. And things will only get worse if living columnist Beth Teitell and arts reporters Terry Byrne and Dana Bisbee are laid off, as the Weekly Dig and Media Nation’s Dan Kennedy reported earlier this week. (Before his promotion was announced, Convey told the Phoenix no layoffs had been finalized; word inside the Herald is that as many as five editorial staffers will be axed by the end of the year.) Working hard and working smart is a nice goal. But at a certain point, the Herald simply won’t have enough people.

Convey’s promotion can be read as both a symptom and a response to this generalized decline. No one expected Chandler to be leading the Herald come 2010; in fact, when Chandler became editorial director in 2004, he publicly stated that he expected Convey to run the paper before too long. But with Purcell in full cost-cutting mode, this was an ideal time to shed Chandler’s hefty salary. (The exact size of that salary is unclear, but as a former editor of the New York Post, Chandler can’t come cheap.) In addition, the Herald reports that Purcell has no immediate plans to fill the managing-editor post currently held by Convey, which means still more savings.

That said, Convey may be better suited than Chandler to lead the tabloid through its current woes. Unlike Chandler, Convey’s career has revolved around the Herald. He first joined the staff as a business reporter in 1981. By the mid ’90s — when Purcell bought the paper from Rupert Murdoch — Convey (then the managing editor for features) was part of the ruling troika known as the Micks with Dicks, along with editor Andrew Costello and Andrew Gully, the managing editor for news. In 2004, after a brief stint at CNC, he returned to the paper to serve as Chandler’s number two. In other words, aside from his time at the CNC and three years at Boston magazine, the focus of Convey’s professional life has been the Herald. Consequently, he probably has as deep a connection to the tabloid as anyone in Boston.

1  |  2  |   next >
Related:
  Topics: Media -- Dont Quote Me , Ken Chandler , Pat Purcell , Media ,  More more >
  • Share:
  • RSS feed Rss
  • Email this article to a friend Email
  • Print this article Print
Comments
Tabloid dreams
If the Herald's "basically irrelevant," why doesn't the "astute Boston observer" give us his/her name? What's there to be afraid of?
By Frank Quaratiello on 11/29/2006 at 3:34:39
Tabloid dreams
By way of disclosure, I'm deputy business editor at the Boston Herald and we're still going strong.
By Frank Quaratiello on 11/29/2006 at 3:37:14
Tabloid dreams
Wow. You get a lot of comments, huh?
By Just a chump on 11/30/2006 at 5:44:34

Today's Event Picks
ARTICLES BY ADAM REILLY
Share this entry with Delicious
  •   FAIR IS FOUL  |  November 17, 2008
    What's the fuss over the Fairness Doctrine really about?
  •   RACIAL HEALING  |  November 10, 2008
    Former mayoral opponents Ray Flynn and Mel King discuss how far their city’s come, and how far it hasn’t, since 1983
  •   NIGHT OF THE LIVING DEAD  |  November 03, 2008
    What if the election doesn’t end on Election Day?
  •   BULL DISCLOSURE  |  October 22, 2008
    As the candidates prep for the final debate, it’s a fitting time to ask: why do some journalistic conflicts of interest become scandals, while others get almost no attention at all?
  •   ROLLED  |  October 02, 2008
    Where’s the outrage over media mistreatment at the RNC?

 See all articles by: ADAM REILLY

MOST POPULAR
RSS Feed of for the most popular articles
 Most Viewed   Most Emailed 



Wednesday, December 03, 2008  |  Sign In  |  Register
 
thePhoenix.com:
Phoenix Media/Communications Group:
TODAY'S FEATURED ADVERTISERS
Copyright © 2008 The Phoenix Media/Communications Group