Moonsigns  |  Band Guide  |  Blogs  |  Adult
Boston  |  Portland  |  Providence
 
Flashbacks  |  Letters  |  Media -- Dont Quote Me  |  News Features  |  The Editorial Page  |  This Just In

A watchdog of the labyrinth

Politics and other mistakes
By AL DIAMON  |  April 2, 2008

It costs Maine legislators almost a million bucks a year to hire somebody to embarrass them.

If they decide to privatize the job, I’ll do it for half that.

To demonstrate my embarrassing expertise, here’s a free sample: Back in 2006, Democratic state Senator Libby Mitchell of Vassalboro had nothing but praise for the state Office of Program Evaluation and Government Accountability (OPEGA) and its mandate to seek out inefficiency in state government. “It is the only arm the Legislature has,” she told the Kennebec Journal, “to give us an independent view of agencies.” In 2008, Mitchell, the Senate majority leader, is one of the leaders — along with Assistant Majority Leader John Martin, the state senator from Eagle Lake — of an effort to abolish OPEGA.

Actually, that’s not such a good example of my skills as an embarrasser. That’s because Mitchell and Martin are right.

In almost 17 years of producing this column, I never dreamed I’d write those words.

For a million dollars a year, OPEGA is an abundant source of reports that disconcert legislators and upset bureaucrats. But when it comes to saving money, it’s pretty much worthless.

And saving money is what OPEGA is supposed to do. In an op-ed written in 2001 during debate over creating the agency, then-Republican state Representative David Trahan of Waldoboro said, “I can only imagine how much money would be freed [by OPEGA] for better use, for schools, health care or tax relief.”

The operative word there is “imagine.”

Since OPEGA began its work in 2005, it’s uncovered waste, fraud, incompetence, and abuse totaling, hmmm ... about $168,000. (It’s also suggested ways of saving another $2 million, ways that will probably never be implemented for reasons I’ll explain later.) During the same period, the agency cost taxpayers, let’s see ... about $3 million.

Admittedly, you can’t put a dollar value on the embarrassment it’s caused. Like the report OPEGA issued that showed that between 2003 and 2005, the state spent over $600 million on economic development programs without bothering to figure out if most of that cash had actually created or preserved any jobs. OPEGA suggested ways to evaluate that spending to see if it was working, but those methods were rejected by the administration of Democratic Governor John Baldacci as too expensive.

Nevertheless, the Legislature booked $5 million in savings in the current supplemental budget from the mishmash of tax breaks, grants, and handouts the state offers to businesses, without requiring the administration to figure out where those reductions could best be made to improve results. If OPEGA wants credit for that bit of political prestidigitation, it can have it.

The real reason Republicans pushed hard to create OPEGA — and, as I write this, are still battling to preserve it — is not because it might save more money than it costs. Given the Legislature’s long history with oversight agencies, the GOP knows that’s unlikely to happen.

From the late 1970s until the mid-1990s, Maine had a sunset law that required regular reviews of state agencies to see if they were doing anything productive. The Legislature’s Audit and Program Review Committee was responsible for those reviews, and in the law’s first year, its members took that responsibility seriously. They produced a long list of embarrassing waste that could be eliminated. Speaker of the House John Martin (yes, the same one who’s now a state senator) didn’t like that at all. He thought the whole process made the Legislature look foolish. So, Martin took steps to kill nearly all the committee’s recommendations. After that, committee members continued to do the annual reviews — reviews that cost a quarter-million dollars a year — but they stopped calling for any cuts. Eventually, the whole process was abolished, thereby producing its only real savings.

The reason Republicans like OPEGA is not because it cuts spending. It’s because it can’t embarrass them, seeing as how they’re not in charge. Democrats control the Legislature and the executive branch. So, any stupidity the agency uncovers reflects badly on the Dems. OPEGA provides a political payoff to the minority party, even if it never offers a comparable benefit to taxpayers.

“It’s an appalling way to do business,” GOP state Senator Kevin Raye of Perry told the Portland Press Herald.

“Shenanigans like this undermine confidence in elected officials,” Raye announced in a press release.

Those statements would constitute an astute assessment of the situation if Raye had been criticizing his own party’s allegiance to OPEGA. Unfortunately, he wasn’t. He was just annoyed because Martin inserted the proposal to kill the agency into the budget bill in a last-minute piece of legislative legerdemain. It’s embarrassing when an experienced pol like Raye gets snookered like that.

But unlike OPEGA, it’s an inexpensive embarrassment.

Too embarrassed to tell me off to my face? Do it by e-mail at aldiamon@herniahill.net.

Related:
  • Grand new party?
    Letters to the Boston editor, March 28, 2008
  • The high hurdles
    Obstacles for Dukakis in the long run
  • What now?
    Republican defeats are just the first step in turning the nation around. Plus, the constitutional imperative of gay marriage.
  • More more >
  Topics: Talking Politics , John Martin , Libby Mitchell , U.S. Government ,  More more >
  • Share:
  • RSS feed Rss
  • Email this article to a friend Email
  • Print this article Print
Comments

MOST POPULAR
 Most Viewed   Most Emailed 



Featured Articles in Talking Politics:
Wednesday, July 09, 2008  |  Sign In  |  Register
 
thePhoenix.com:
Phoenix Media/Communications Group:
StuffAtNight Latest:
TODAY'S FEATURED ADVERTISERS
Copyright © 2008 The Phoenix Media/Communications Group