LISTINGS |  EDITOR'S PICKS |  NEWS |  MUSIC |  MOVIES |  DINING |  LIFE |  ARTS |  REC ROOM |  THE BEST |  CLASSIFIED

This story blows

May 30, 2007 2:31:52 PM

pages: 1 | 2 | 3

Hill’s charges merit a healthy measure of skepticism. For example, if WCAI is, as she puts it, “very upset” that a local citizen’s group backs the Cape Wind proposal, why did the station recently give air time to Chris Stimpson — a Clean Power Now member — to expound on wind power’s glories?

Nearly every claim and counterclaim in this spat raises similar questions. Start with WCAI’s alleged decision to ignore Williams’s reading: since on-air bookstore promos are, by Jack Moye’s own admission, relatively uncommon, is it really that surprising that the station didn’t plug the event on air? Or consider Brooks’s claim of a “boycott”: what about the fact that WCAI carried Cape Wind co-author Williams’s interview with nationally syndicated talk-show host Diane Rhem?

That said, WCAI’s delay in providing any original coverage of Cape Wind does seem weird. (It has already been reviewed by, among others, the New York Times, the Wall Street Journal, the Weekly Standard, and even the Cape Cod Times.) The book deals with the biggest issue to hit the Cape in decades. You’d think the station would have found a way to squeeze it into the schedule by now.

Even if no conspiracy against Cape Wind exists, you really can’t blame wind-farm supporters for imagining that one might. As the book itself makes clear — with details that transcend its undeniably strong point of view — the political, economic, and cultural clout of Cape Wind’s opponents is remarkable. No, the anti-wind-farm forces probably haven’t kept WCAI from reporting on Cape Wind. But that doesn’t mean they wouldn’t like to.


pages: 1 | 2 | 3
COMMENTS

I must say Adam Reilly, this story blows. What an apt title. I think it would have helped if you had looked into Walter Brook's site, capecodtoday.com. The censorship of public comments abound when it comes to the Cape Wind project. I found it absolutely hilarious for Brooks to cry foul over his self created 'windstorm of protest' over supposed censorship since he routinely censors, deletes, alters and publicly admonishes commenters on his ONLY pro-Cape Wind stories. Talk about hypocrisy. I was told in an email by Brooks when I stood up to his censorship "This is not a public medium. I own it and do what I like... Why don't you offer you priceless prose to CCTimes which is more your kind anyway." Then he called me a stupid woman and told me to f**k off..." Brooks has posted out right distortions of the facts concerning Elizabeth White. Not surprising for him since that is what he does. He and WW have a lot in common in terms of tabloid journalism. Brooks unlike NPR has no credibility whatsoever when it comes to his charges against others. And since when is a radio station obligated to promote anyone's book?

POSTED BY Dona Tracy AT 05/31/07 12:54 PM
And now cctoday.com is attempting to smear the Cape Cod Natural History Museum and linking to your article to do it. Do check out the plethora of articles attempting to smear anyone and everyone that decides not to promote Wendy Williams book to see how the publisher of that site doth protest too much.

POSTED BY Dona Tracy AT 05/31/07 1:13 PM
Do take a look at my news and commentary piece on the Cape Wind book... //www.huliq.com/22383/news-and-commentary-on-cape-wind-book-and-interview-with-co-author-on-diane-rhem-s-show FYI, I had an email conversation with William Grimes reviewer of Wendy Williams and Robert Whitcomb's Cape Wind book for the New York Times (Who has by the way supported the Cape Wind project in their editorials). In his words "It is a bad book and badly written too". Amen

POSTED BY Dona Tracy AT 05/31/07 1:33 PM
PS. The headline and the page linking your article to a smear on the Cape Cod Natural History Museum has disappeared from capecodtoday.com This is a typical tactic of Mr. Brooks and his biased site. Now you see it now you don't. But if you would like to see it, I've copied, saved it and would be more than happy to send it to you and anyone else who might be interested. Those of us who have been censored on that site make it a habit to copy and save, not only our comments but anything that might simply disappear from view. You may agree with Mr. Brooks on the Cape Wind project but surely you don't agree with this kind of manipulation and censorship, hopefully.

POSTED BY Dona Tracy AT 05/31/07 4:23 PM
Dona, I'd love to look at the Cape Cod Today post. Could you please email it to me at areilly@thephoenix.com? Thanks.

POSTED BY Adam AT 05/31/07 5:19 PM
Be happy to. It is on its way. But, how many posts would you like to see? There is quite a long list of them now. :) All attempting to smear and bully anyone who doesn't wish to promote Wendy Williams book. Have you promoted it yet?

POSTED BY Dona Tracy AT 05/31/07 5:42 PM
Just an update for you Adam. Brooks has now altered the link to this post so it only views as the printer friendly version without the comments. He is the king of censorship. Perhaps you might write another article showing more than a one-sided version that slams good people for standing up for their constitutional rights? If Wendy Williams and Robert Whitcomb had done that perhaps their book might have had some journalistic integrity.

POSTED BY Dona Tracy AT 06/01/07 7:37 AM
Great piece for letting people know that deep pockets and even organizations like the Nature Conservancy which has a lot of (clout__private wealthy doners) have continued to twist this into a "marine threat" and "blight" when in fact the size from shore is no larger than a small dot. I was surprised when I had applied for a job downtown and discovered that this not for profit organization purports to help the environment when most of their effort has been the side " at least in this issue of Cape Wind" 180 degrees in the opposite stance. Letting my views be known during the interview about the Cape Wind it was no surprise to me that they never called me back for another interview. OOPS, but I figured eventually this would come to a head and it has. Thanks to Wendy and the insightful article. Thomdar

POSTED BY thomdar AT 06/05/07 11:26 PM

Login to add comments to this article
Email

Password




Register Now  |   Lost password

MOST POPULAR

 VIEWED   EMAILED 

More
ADVERTISEMENT

BY THIS AUTHOR

PHOENIX MEDIA GROUP
CLASSIFIEDS







TODAY'S FEATURED ADVERTISERS
   
Copyright © 2007 The Phoenix Media/Communications Group