FIND MOVIES
Movie List
Loading ...
or
Find Theaters and Movie Times
or
Search Movies

Voodoo economics

What vampire and zombie movies can tell us about the future of capitalism
By PETER KEOUGH  |  May 21, 2010

1005_zombies_main
To paraphrase The Communist Manifesto, a specter is haunting Hollywood. Actually, two of them: zombies and vampires. The undead.

Not only do people want to watch the undead, as demonstrated by the ongoing flood of films about vampires and zombies and the big box office they pull in, they want to be the undead. “Zombie walks” — in which thousands of participants gather, made-up as ambulant, flesh-eating corpses (some reputedly entering a trance-like, zomboid state) — have sprung up over the past decade or so, dawning first in Sacramento in 2001, and then spreading to marches in Greater Boston (notably in Somerville, as well as last October’s invasion of Newbury Street) and dozens of other metropolises worldwide, including Detroit, Pittsburgh, Toronto, various British cities, Shanghai, and Brisbane, Australia.

Not even George A. Romero, who as much as anyone can take credit for the zombie phenomenon — spawning it as he did back in 1968 with Night of the Living Dead — can explain why they do this. “I don’t get it,” he remarked about these undead wannabes when I interviewed him recently about his newly released sixth film in his zombie franchise, Survival of the Dead, which opens next week. “You just want to say, ‘Get a life.’ ”

Rather than getting a life for themselves, however, other fans go as far as wanting their newborn children to be undead, as well. An article in the May 8 New York Times reports that the name growing most rapidly in popularity for boys these days is Cullen, the name of the vampire clan in Stephenie Meyer’s four-book Twilight series. It goes without saying that these happy parents will also be lining up on June 30 to see The Twilight Saga: Eclipse, the series’ third cinematic adaptation, the two previous films having already grossed more than $1.1 billion worldwide.

High Marx
What’s the appeal of such memento mori, such models of soulless rapacity? Fear and desire would be my first guesses. And sex and death. You can’t get much more basic than that: we dread and desire both extinction and reproduction (or so Freud would have it), and such powerful psychic forces shape the waking nightmares that we call entertainment.

Sex and death, along with taxes, we always have with us, and consequently both vampires and zombies (and mummies and Frankenstein’s monster fit in there somewhere, too, I suppose) have persisted throughout the history of cinema. But Freud doesn’t shed much light on why they are more popular at certain times and not others, or why sometimes one revenant has the edge over the other. Or why both movie monsters have proliferated in the past few years as abundantly as have subprime mortgages in Goldman Sachs’s portfolios.

Maybe Karl Marx, wrong about so much in the real world, could offer some clarification in the realm of make-believe. Could vampires, like the filthy rich, parasitic, aristocratic, and charismatic Cullens, be representatives of the capitalist class? And zombies, those lumpen, lurching, mass-consuming legions, could they stand for labor and the proletariat? If so, vampire movies would embody the audience’s anger and fascination with the money men responsible for the recent economic collapse. And zombie movies would touch on the dread of — and wish for — an uprising of the working against those same exploiters.

1  |  2  |  3  |  4  |   next >
  Topics: Features , Entertainment, Entertainment, Jacques Tourneur,  More more >
| More


Most Popular
ARTICLES BY PETER KEOUGH
Share this entry with Delicious
  •   BUFFET DINING: THE 15TH BOSTON UNDERGROUND FILM FESTIVAL  |  March 19, 2013
    "Copraphagy" is a key word at this year's Boston Underground Film Festival at the Brattle.
  •   REVIEW: GINGER & ROSA  |  March 19, 2013
    Sally Potter likes to mess around with form and narrative.
  •   UNDERGROUND CINEMA: THE 12TH BOSTON TURKISH FILM FESTIVAL  |  March 12, 2013
    This year's Boston Turkish Film Festival includes works in which directors ponder the relationships between the secular and the religious, between men and women, and between destiny and identity.
  •   REVIEW: A GLIMPSE INSIDE THE MIND OF CHARLES SWAN III  |  March 12, 2013
    In Roman Coppola's sophomoric second feature (his 2001 debut CQ was promising), Charlie Sheen shows restraint as the titular asshole, a dissolute ad designer and solipsistic whiner who's mooning over the loss of his latest love.
  •   REVIEW: UPSIDE DOWN  |  March 14, 2013
    Had Ed Wood Jr. directed Fritz Lang's Metropolis , he couldn't have achieved the earnest dopiness of Juan Solanas's sci-fi allegory — nor the striking images.

 See all articles by: PETER KEOUGH