FIND MOVIES
Movie List
Loading ...
or
Find Theaters and Movie Times
or
Search Movies

Hell boy

Fassbinder’s Berlin Alexanderplatz at the ICA
By MICHAEL ATKINSON  |  March 18, 2008
3.5 3.5 Stars

080321_alexanderplantz_main
FASSBINDERIANS REJOICE: Berlin Alexanderplatz is meant to express a psychological inferno, and it succeeds.

Berlin Alexanderplatz | Directed by Rainer Werner Fassbinder | Written by Fassbinder based on the novel by Alfred Döblin | with Günter Lamprecht, Karlheinz Braun, Hanna Schygulla, Barbara Sukowa, and Claus Holm | German | Bavaria Film International | 939 minutes
Fassbinderians rejoice — your crucifixion, your tribulative martyrdom, has arrived, in the restored re-release of a little ordeal called Berlin Alexanderplatz (1980), the definitive altar upon which to test your faith in cinema. Non-Fassbinderians — will you dare? Infamous for its willfully unwieldy size (15-1/2 hours), the film qualifies as a cultural behemoth, a work that demands a revision in our method of watching, experiencing, and assessing cinema. It’s a pivotal giant in a very peculiar subgenre of arthouse movie — the TV mini-series-as-all-in-one-auteurwerk, alongside Bergman’s uncut Fanny and Alexander, Wolfgang Petersen’s uncut Das Boot, Kieslowski’s The Decalogue — but like all extremely long films, Rainer Werner Fassbinder’s rampaging mega-work becomes, eventually, about its own length. Any film longer than, say, five hours inevitably calls its own basic shape and length into question, risking tedium and repetition but striving for experiential revelations and immersions for which ordinary mortal movies cannot hope. Some films use extreme time to disrupt our sense of reality (this is one facet of Jacques Rivette’s career scheme); others try to capture the breadth of an ambitious novel, neglecting the point that no one reads Dickens or Joyce or Mann in one or two sittings. (Hence the weekly broadcast mode, which shouldn’t be dismissed.) Taken as a whole, Fassbinder’s magnum opus — adapting the 1929 novel by Alfred Döblin that haunted Fassbinder his whole life, and that emerges in signs and fragments in many of his other movies — is not an alternate reality so much as a near-endless mildewy-bell-jar briefing for a descent into Hell, in an already hellish Weimar Germany, where women are bawling trash, men are lurking hyenas, and the world is a combustion engine run on souls.

It’s meant to express a psychological inferno, and it succeeds. (The first chapter, as in the book, is titled The Punishment Begins.) Fassbinder’s keening, in-your-face post-Sirk theatricality is an acquired taste (has anyone pointed out how his later films scan like a Leone-Morricone portrait of German lowlife?), and this is the harvest crop, epic in length but terrifyingly claustrophobic scene by scene, episode by episode, a nightmare of clueless doom in which Berlin is often reduced to a flat and a bar room photographed in the ocher haze of an opium den. What happens is like the slo-mo footage of a fatal car wreck: Franz Biberkopf (Günter Lamprecht), a great, bullish, dim lug of a man, is released from prison (he’s done a stint for manslaughter) and thrust back into his old life of pimping and violence. From the start, it’s clear that Biberkopf is unhinging, and as the hours press on and his struggle to stay honest and happy becomes truly hopeless, the film takes on the aura of a saintly tribulation. Indeed, Döblin’s novel, which ran neck and neck with the montage-of-voices experiments of Joyce and Dos Passos, is an existential tragedy about the post-war culture as much as about its protagonist, and Fassbinder goes for maximum iconicity. He helplessly loses much of the book’s tumultuous scope (as it was, the film was humonguously expensive for German TV, but how much bigger could it possibly have been?), training in instead on its hero, who in the uncomprehending, porcine person of Lamprecht becomes, 15 hours later, embedded in the brain like a fossilized footprint.

1  |  2  |   next >
  Topics: Reviews , Entertainment, Movies, Hanna Schygulla,  More more >
| More


Most Popular
ARTICLES BY MICHAEL ATKINSON
Share this entry with Delicious
  •   REVIEW: FAR FROM AFGHANISTAN  |  March 06, 2013
    A contemporary mirror of 1967's multidirector lefty-agitprop masterpiece Far from Vietnam , this omnibus epic plumbs the American quagmire in Central Asia from the aesthetic viewpoints of five western filmmakers assembled by John Gianvito (who also contributes a segment), plus a cadre of Afghan locals called Afghan Voices.
  •   OVERDRIVE: THE FILMS OF LEOS CARAX  |  February 11, 2013
    Every Carax shot is a new way to feel about something...
  •   AUTEUR LIMITS: THE FILMS OF STANLEY KUBRICK  |  January 30, 2013
    There will never be another Stanley — cinema's greatest loner-demigod, the hermit CEO of hip public culture for decades running, the filmmaker-artiste everyone could obsess about even if they didn't know any other working director by name.
  •   REVIEW: NOTHING BUT A MAN (1964)  |  January 08, 2013
    Michael Roemer's modest, eloquent, New Wave-y micro-movie — made independently in 1964 — is essential viewing for its matter-of-fact look at an average black man's struggle for dignity in the Deep South in the early '60s.
  •   REVIEW: THE DEEP BLUE SEA  |  March 29, 2012
    Like a bad dream trapped in amber, Terence Davies's studied film adaptation of Terence Rattigan's famous 1952 play is both spectrally beautiful and frozen in self-regard.

 See all articles by: MICHAEL ATKINSON