The Phoenix Network:
 
 
 
About  |  Advertise
Moonsigns  |  BandGuide  |  Blogs
 
 

Palin: Politics Over Country

I flew back to sea level today after learning the big news, and spent much of my journey home pondering it and discussing it with people in airports and on planes. My initial reaction, which I still hold, was, "well, that should ensure that Obama wins 40 states."

It's a Hail Mary pass, and although I thought that he probably needs one, I didn't believe he would make one; I thought he would make a safe pick and keep hammering away and hope for the best.

I have plenty of thoughts about the political ramifications, and what Obama should do, and what to watch for, and those sorts of things that I normally analyze. But at this hour I feel the need to express not the political analysis, but my increasing personal outrage over this announcement.

This selection, so obviously political, so obviously insulting and condescending to women (I can make the right-wingers happy, and win swing votes because broads will vote for a dame!), is ultimately a flat-out statement that John McCain doesn't give a rat's ass about this country.

Nobody can say with a straight face that John McCain thinks that Sarah Palin is capable and prepared to be President. I don't just mean that the political reasons were more important to him than the readiness factor; I mean that he cannot possibly think that she is at all capable and qualified.

Let me put this simply: John McCain has put his political ambition above the good of the country.

The observation, made by many today, that this pick makes it harder for McCain to attack Obama's lack of "experience," is correct but far too generous. Comparisons of Palin's experience and qualifications to Obama's are a gross insult.

Barack Obama is a Harvard Law graduate who spent years in successful non-profit service, spent seven years representing much of the nation's third-largest city in the upper legislative house of one of the state's most populous states, and has then represented that state as US Senator.

Comparisons to Dan Quayle are also way off: Quayle had a long and impressive political resume when Bush the Elder picked him.

Palin? Up until a couple of years ago, her resume featured a BA in journalism, some commercial fishing, a little TV sportscasting, and a little local political success in a town roughly the size of Boxborough.

It is an outrage that John McCain would place this person next in line to be President.

Whether that matters politically remains to be seen; Obama and other Democrats probably need to step gingerly on making this point, for fear of looking sexist -- particularly coming on the heels of the whole Hillary thing.

Fortunately, my guess is that if the Democrats just keep their mouths shut, lifelong misogynist John McCain will end up demeaning her himself -- perhaps he can suggest that she enter the Miss Buffalo Chip pageant?

  • Warren A. Frick said:

    One of the most demeaning, insulting, shallow thought articles I have ever seen published.  The died-in-the-wood liberal socialistic dunderhead who wrote this could REALLY activate one helluva lot of we "silent majority" to go to the polls and kick butt on Hussien.

    THANK YOU.

    August 30, 2008 5:44 PM
  • Tony Schinella said:

    Ouch David. I think you're really, REALLY off base here. I will give you the fact that it was a craven pick. But come on, 40 states? Misogyny? Totally missing the fact that Obama and Palin have similar backgrounds and the only difference is that she ISN'T on the top of the ticket? You're a better political observer than this.

    August 30, 2008 8:00 PM
  • Josh said:

    Similar backgrounds?

    Let's see:

    Obama: Occidental College, Columbia University, Harvard Law.  Ran a community organization, taught at University of Chicago, then served 7 years in the state Senate followed by 4 years in the US Senate.

    Palin: University of Idaho.  Worked as a sportscaster, and briefly in commercial fishing.  Runner-up in a beauty contest.  4 years on city counsil in Wasilla, AK (population estimated between approx. 5500-8000 depending on source), followed by 2 terms as mayor of same.  18 months' experience as Governor of Alaska.

    So in other words, her total time in the political world is only a year or so less than Obama's.  In that regard, their experience is similar.  And they both smoked pot (granted, I'm quoting Palin's Wikipedia page for that so it's not 100% even though it's cited).  But does 8 years in a small town (half as mayor) plus a year and a half as Governor of a small state equal 7 years in the state Senate and 4 in the US Senate representing one of the largest states?  Does her educational and work background equal Obama's?

    I guess to belittle them all, McCain's experience consists of a military career, 4 years in the House, and his Senate career.  No executive experience.  Biden has spent his whole career in the Senate.  And the current inhabitant of the Oval Office?  Failed businessman, 1 full term as governor of Texas and was reelected.  Then again, look at how that turned out.

    August 31, 2008 9:17 AM
  • Bruce said:

    This is lame, Dave.

    The fact that Barack Obama, a painfully under-qualified candidate and unrepentant son of the corrupt Chicago political machine, is at the top of the Dem ticket tells me that the Democrat Party has placed political correctness and the expansion of leftist, big-government bureaucracy above the good of the country.

    Palin attacked corruption in her own party with a closed fist. Your Golden Boy embraced it with open arms.

    Obama talks "change", but he picked for his running mate one of the most entrenched Washington insiders this "lowest approval ratings ever" Congress has to offer.

    Whether you approve or not, Sarah Palin represents Middle America, and embodies what Abraham Lincoln had in mind when he spoke about a "government of the people".

    The undeniable truth is that if McCain had picked Romney or some other white guy, you and the rest of the talking heads in the liberal media would be screaming about what a racist, sexist pig he is for not picking a woman or a minority.

    As to your prediction that Obama will take 40 states?

    What are you smoking these days?

    Then again, you also told me back in '04 that "Bush is all done", and more recently, that I was going to be very upset with the SCOTUS ruling on Heller v. DC.

    You used to be smart.

    What happened?

    September 1, 2008 1:17 PM
  • Derek said:

    I would expect nothing less from Mr. Bernstein.  His meaningless tirades have become tiresome and laughable.  I guess I shouldn't expect anything worthwhile on a site that feature Michael Moore adds.

    Dave, stop being so angry and just face the fact that the majority of America doesn't believe in socialism.

    September 2, 2008 12:31 PM
  • Wayne said:

    McCain and Palin > Hussein and Hairpiece.  Ha Ha.  I like that,  Hussein and Hairpiece.  Why did Biden take off his hairpiece?  Because it was driving him Hussein.  I know, it's not really a toupe.  It's plugs.  Hahaha LOLZ.

    September 2, 2008 1:05 PM
  • Liberals-R-Losers said:

    [Tony Schinella  said:

    Ouch David. I think you're really, REALLY off base here. I will give you the fact that it was a craven pick. But come on, 40 states? Misogyny? Totally missing the fact that Obama and Palin have similar backgrounds and the only difference is that she ISN'T on the top of the ticket? >>You're a better political observer than this.<<]

    No, he isn't. He is a typical liberal asshat.

    September 2, 2008 8:19 PM

Leave a Comment

Login | Not a member yet? Click here to Join

(required)  
(optional)
(required)  




Tuesday, May 12, 2009  |  Sign In  |  Register
 
thePhoenix.com:
Phoenix Media/Communications Group:
TODAY'S FEATURED ADVERTISERS
Copyright © 2008 The Phoenix Media/Communications Group