The Phoenix Network:
 
 
About  |  Advertise
Adult  |  Moonsigns  |  Band Guide  |  Blogs  |  In Pictures
 

Shame on the Boston City Council

And thanks to Shirley Kressel, Kathleen Devine, and Kevin McCrea for challenging the council's blatant disregard for the state's Open Meeting Law.

You'd think this ruling by Suffolk Superior Court Judge Nancy Staffier Holtz would change the M.O. up at City Hall. But old habits die hard.

  • Share:
  • Share this entry with Facebook
  • Share this entry with Digg
  • Share this entry with Delicious
  • Email this article to a friend
  • Print this article

7 Comments

  • Concerned citizen of Boston said:

    Didn't I just read in last Saturday's Herald that Adler Pollock & Sheehan, a Providence law firm , had hired Council President Michael Flaherty and is openly touting him to their clients as "the next mayor of Boston"? (You can read the article by searching for "flaherty" on the Herald site)

    Pardon me for suggesting that we actually hold an election before anointing the ringleader of these illegal meetings the mayor of the city.  And why does a law firm hire a guy who was on trial for - and is now found guilty of - breaking the law?   "The councilor has always practiced law on a limited basis," said Flaherty's spokesperson, Andrew Kenneally.  Hey, at least he's consistent - he practices democracy on a limited basis, too.

    Here's a suggestion for Team Flaherty as they prepare their '09 bumper stickers (I hope they're not at the printers already) - "Mike For Mayor:  What You Don't Know Won't Hurt You."

    And $11,000 might not seem like much, but that's money that should be used for something the city needs, not paying a fine for breaking the public meeting law.  Kudos to all the councilors who had the good sense to stay away from these meetings.  Adam - any idea who (besides Arroyo, mentioned in the Globe piece) put the law ahead of their own political interests on this one?

    March 28, 2006 12:52 PM
  • kevin mccrea said:

    Thanks for blogging about this Adam.   To answer the concerned citizen:  The only ones who avoided these meetings were Hennigan, Arroyo, Yancey and Turner.    All the rest of them actively participated in the meetings, despite Councilor Arroyo writing to them and saying he believed that the meetings violated the law.

      As Arroyo says in the article it is sad, that citizens had to bring this suit.   It is too bad no elected official would stand up to them, including the DA and AG whom we asked personally to enforce the law.

    You can read the decision in it's entirety on my website electkevin.us, and many of the pleadings, etc. can be found on my blog.

    Kevin McCrea

    March 28, 2006 2:53 PM
  • Adam said:

    Kevin, sorry I didn't link to your site earlier--I just added it to the post.

    March 28, 2006 3:50 PM
  • don warner saklad said:

    Please interview, do a story on the central staff of Boston City Council. Ann Hess is the Council Staff Director. What backgrounds do Council central staff bring to the office?...

    March 29, 2006 1:40 PM
  • Kurt said:

    The only thing this does is hand the Mayor even more power over a statutorily weak Council.  They got more for their constituents through negotiations over the budget and other matters and now that won't be able to happen.  

    Also, this issue obviously doesn't resonate with Boston voters.  Ask Kevin McCrea, he came in last in the recent election.  

    As for Councilors working at 2nd jobs -- most do.

    March 30, 2006 8:09 PM
  • JOhn Q Public said:

    Concerned citizen has no balls - otherwise he would put his name.  Easy to take anonymous shots at someone...

    John Q Public

    April 1, 2006 10:50 PM
  • tony schinella said:

    Hurray for this group! Shirley Kressel is a hero of mine. :-)  

    April 3, 2006 12:20 AM

Leave a Comment

Login | Not a member yet? Click here to Join
Follow the Boston Phoenix
twitter facebook myspace youtube rss
All Blogs
more by Adam Reilly
Greg Epstein, Atheist Superstar | November 27, 2009
Unmaking a bad federal law | November 27, 2009
Collateral damage? | November 13, 2009
Holy terror? | November 13, 2009
Difference of opinion | November 06, 2009

 See all articles by: Adam Reilly

ADVERTISEMENT
Latest Comments
DJ Hero: Enter to Win a Free Copy! - I need some help Christmas is coming ang my mother just passed away (I swear to god and on her grave...

By Austin on 11-30-2009 in Laser Orgy

RIP, Mike Penner / Christine Daniels - I reread your earlier piece about Aiden Quinn, but I can't say I understand your logic. Yes, I agree...

By Brian on 11-30-2009 in Dont Quote Me

Khazei Sneaking Up? - I was going to vote for Coakley but switched to Khazei over the weekend after a few of my friends got...

By Matt on 11-30-2009 in Talking Politics

Lee Ranaldo picks his favorite albums of the decade - We asked Fletcher the same question: "Um, dude? Why is the camera on you instead of on Lee?"...

By Carly Carioli on 11-30-2009 in On The Download

Khazei Sneaking Up? - As a Capuano supporter, I'm miffed by his TV ads so far. The first, heartfelt and "nice," was...

By ricklapel on 11-29-2009 in Talking Politics

Latest Comments from Talking Politics
Most Viewed
Recap: Snoop Dogg, Devin the Dude, and Redman and Method Man at the House of Blues
Say Anything at the House of Blues | October 30
REVIEW: Thao Nguyen and The Get Down Stay Down at Middle East
Ticket On-Sale Alert: Harry and the Potters, Mario, Passion Pit, The Lion King, more
VIDEO: Halloween Mash UP
Mp3 of the Week: American Hi-Fi (with bonus Stacy Jones Q&A)
CLICK TRACKS: Music News Roundup (Walken' on Gaga, Weezer in Snuggies, Bono straddles the Berlin Wall, and more)
Most Viewed from Talking Politics
Search Blogs
 
Talking Politics Archives
Monday, November 30, 2009  |  Sign In  |  Register
 
TODAY'S FEATURED ADVERTISERS
thePhoenix.com
Phoenix Media/Communications Group
Copyright © 2009 The Phoenix Media/Communications Group