Keller, Kennedy, and "Crashing"

Published Oct 22 2007, 10:35 PM by David S. Bernstein

In discussing the issue of Jon Keller's attribution in "The Bluest State," my friend and former Phoenix cohort Dan Kennedy recently observed that, for good or ill, it is common practice in general-audience trade publishing to not provide sourcing for public-domain material, broadly defined. He was challenged to document that assertion; he understandably responded that he didn't have that kind of spare time. Various bloggers, primarily at Blue Mass Group, then set to work documenting the number of end notes in various general-interest political books, and used those findings to argue that Kennedy is wrong, and Keller is a plagiarist.

They seem to have misunderstood Kennedy's point. You can publish end notes from here to next week, and still not attribute sourcing forthe type of material under discussion. (You can also publish extensive end notes and still have outright falsehoods clogging the pages of your book, but that's not at issue here.)

To illustrate, earlier today I grabbed off my shelf "Crashing the Gate" by Jerome Armstrong and Markos Moulitsas Zuniga, which I chose because A) it was handy; B) I saw it specifically cited on BMG as part of this discussion; C) it's a similar type of book -- opinion politics for a general audience; D) like Keller's book, it intersperses first-hand reporting with second-hand research; and E) I recall thinking, when I originally read it, that "Crashing" was thinly sourced.

I opened my hardback copy of "Crashing" randomly, to page 89, and scanned until I found this suspect, un-footnoted, un-attributed sentence:

In 2004, Stuart Stevens, who came out of Republican politics, and Madison Avenue's Harold Kaplan and Vada Hill, advised the Bush ad makers alongside an informal group of other New Yorkers in the ad business.

A quick Google search quickly led me to an April 19, 2003 New York Magazine feature by Ryan Lizza, the third paragraph of which is:

Like the Reagan team, the Bushies get lots of input from the New York ad world. “I’m a huge fan of Madison Avenue,” says Bush ad-maker Stuart Stevens. “I think some of the most creative people are in that world.” Harold Kaplan of Young & Rubicam is advising Bush, as is Vada Hill, best known for working on Taco Bell’s talking-dog ads. In addition to these formal advisers, Stevens says, the campaign regularly bounces ideas off an informal group of New York ad-makers, just as Reagan’s did.

Pretty clear that Armstrong & Moulitsas got the material from Lizza's article and didn't attribute it.

Armstrong and Moulitsas were certainly familiar with the article; they cite that same Lizza article (both in the text and an endnote) five pages earlier, as the source for a quote from Steve McMahon. They cite the article again in the text (no note) on p. 86, when they run a lengthy (80 words or so) direct excerpt of the article that includes a long quote from Stevens.

As far as I can tell, that is the last reference to Lizza's article as a source. However, it is pretty clearly the source for much, much more -- not just the information in the sentence I happened to pluck out on page 89. The very next sentence in "Crashing," for instance, reads:

In fact, Republicans have been using media professionals since Dwight Eisenhower, when adman Rosser Reeves, from the Ted Bates ad agency, sold Eisenhower on the idea of running television ads ahead of I Love Lucy.

Here's Lizza, in his sixth paragraph:

The ties go back to 1952, when M&M pitchman Rosser Reeves (who made up the phrase “It melts in your mouth, not in your hands”) sold Dwight Eisenhower on the idea of running spots before I Love Lucy.

One could easily posit that Armstrong and Moulitsas borrowed more than just facts and phrasing, but the entire argument of the "Old Ads, New Age" section of their book from Lizza's article, which offered the same basic discussion, using many of the same specific examples.

I'm not looking to bash around Armstrong & Moulitsas. I'm just saying that it's pretty obvious at a glance that their method was to provide attribution when reproducing actual spoken quotations from other articles, and pretty much only in those instances. Certainly, they did not regularly attribute material they considered to be in a very broadly defined "public domain." Which means that, endnotes notwithstanding, "Crashing the Gate" supports Kennedy's observation.

To more fully understand when and how Armstrong & Moulitsas source (for instance, whether they always attribute spoken quotations, or only in some cases), would take a much deeper analysis -- which is exactly what Kennedy was saying. Simply checking for endnotes doesn't tell you anything.

Romneys At Fenway

Romney's Huckabee Problem

4 Comments

Tony Schinella said:

Great snatch David!

October 22, 2007 11:32 PM
qwerty said:

I completely agree with you that "common practice in general-audience trade publishing to not provide sourcing for public-domain material, broadly defined". Furthermore, it will kill sales with the public if the book has too many footnotes! A bibliography would be nice, but for a book that covers current events a list of every article consulted would be laborious and unwieldly. That having been said, he could add some of those things online if he wanted to.

October 23, 2007 1:42 PM
appalled said:

Ridiculous. Orders of magnitude apart from Keller's wholesale lifting of quotes without any attribution whatsover. Fine, the second passage you cite looks like it should have been directly attributed. But they do attribute other material to that same article, more than once. It's something they should fix if there's a second addition. But they clearly weren't trying to prevent the reader from knowing about that source. The same cannot be said for any of the 20 or 30 examples of outright plagiarism in Keller's book detailed in the Herald's analysis. Your first example doesn't fly. That same information could have come from their CVs or bioskethes. And nothing is directly lifted from the passage in Lizza's article. Lizza is not the only person who could look those guys up and take note of their background in advertising.

October 23, 2007 4:36 PM
Jerome Armstrong said:

'qwerty' has explained why every reference isn't included, simply put, those included in CTG were those that the editors felt were necessary. As you note, there are multiple references to Lizza's article, both in the footnote and in the text. Usually, those accused of plagerism (I realize you are not making that accusation) don't bother with such quasi-references. Otherwise, it's a misleading to assert that much of this chapter section is ripped from Lizza-- not true at all. Coming across his article came late in the process, and he had some good supporting/expanding information for the narrative already written. It would have been nice to come across it earlier, and just interview him for the section.

November 1, 2007 3:48 AM

Follow the Boston Phoenix

All Blogs

On The Download (2,176)
Dont Quote Me (527)
Laser Orgy (36)
Phlog (1,432)
Talking Politics (1,529)
Outside The Frame (307)

more by David S. Bernstein

Coakley cashes in at the bar | December 04, 2009

The X factor | November 27, 2009

Ladies' man | November 20, 2009

Has Obama peaked? No, he hasn't | November 13, 2009

The Quiet Storm | November 06, 2009

See all articles by: David S. Bernstein

Latest Comments

GodHatesFags.com Invades Greater Boston - So sad and scary. Ppl must get a life that doesn't thrive on ppls differences. Why live in the USA? You...

By Patty on 12-05-2009 in Phlog

Kenmore cat can't be caught - I wonder if it escaped from the Kenmore cat hospital..

By Ari on 12-05-2009 in Phlog

Boston Public Health Commission's Top 10 Bad Romance Songs of 2009: Is pop music unhealthy? - Wow. Thank you for taking the time to express your very biased opinion. However, I think you need to...

By Jim T on 12-05-2009 in On The Download

VIDEO OF THE WEEK: exclusive Cave In DVD preview - mike you fail'd hard. Please end your life quickly.

By shane on 12-05-2009 in On The Download

RIP, Mike Penner / Christine Daniels - offal, you help make my point. Thanks. Women suffering from depression are now recognized for having...

By O-FISH-L on 12-05-2009 in Dont Quote Me

Latest Comments from Talking Politics

Keller, Kennedy, and "Crashing"

4 Comments

Tony Schinella said:

qwerty said:

appalled said:

Jerome Armstrong said:

Leave a Comment