The Phoenix Network:
 
 
 
About  |  Advertise
Moonsigns  |  BandGuide  |  Blogs
 
 

More New Englanders Speak

Susan Collins, endangered Republican of Maine (yes, Tom Allen trails badly in the polls, but the national anti-GOP mood may yet reach that race), just spoke on the bailout bill. She's voting yes, but like most others wanted to be on the record lambasting everybody she could possibly blame for the situation: "greedy Wall Street traders," "unscrupulous mortgage bankers," "naive or deceptive borrowers," etc. etc. etc. Collins mentioned that she was at one time chair of the Maine commission that regulates the banking and securities industry -- doesn't that suggest she should have seen this crisis coming? Perhaps my colleagues at the Portland Phoenix know better than I whether Allen is making any headway against Collins on this issue.

She was followed by Jack Reed, Democrat of Rhode Island, who is also technically up for re-election. He's voting for the bill. He did have one interesting thing to say: urging against easing mark-to-market regulations, which is picking up steam as a way to help repair the books of financial institutions. (The SEC partially eased the regulations today, Congress is considering going further.) I don't know if it might be necessary, but Reed is right that we should be extremely wary of going back to mark-to-market accounting -- which Enron executives used to great effect.

Mitch McConnell, suddenly vulnerable Republican of Kentucky, is now explaining his Yes vote......zzzzzz....

  • Michael Pahre said:

    You wrote:  "...but Reed is right that we should be extremely wary of going back to mark-to-market accounting -- which Enron executives used to great effect."

    I think you got this mixed-up:  Reed is arguing to keep the current "mark to market" accounting standard, rather than easing up on it or suspending it altogether.

    Also:  Enron's case was more complicated.  They used "mark to model" accounting for illiquid securities.  When people were starting to realize their financial problems, they then resorted to manipulating the computer models to make everything look better.  If I've understood it correctly, the relatively recent requirement of "mark to market" accounting was supposed to avoid the problems of "mark to model" accounting abused Enron (not the other way around).

    The SEC issued guidelines Wednesday easing up on "mark to market" accounting by allowing banks to use "hold to maturity" accounting instead -- but not (yet) allowing them to return to "mark to model" accounting.

    October 1, 2008 11:54 PM
  • LorenzoJennifer said:

    So, we have legislators voting "yes" with so many qualifications and criticisms that a "no" vote would seem the more appropriate.  Is "eating your cake and having it too" another term for an on-the-spot "flip flop".  

    October 2, 2008 1:42 AM
  • Jeff Inglis said:

    David - Allen is hammering Collins on her support for many of Bush's economic policies. And I have a story coming out this week that compares the two of them to each other and to Bush on several issues, including the economy.

    But Allen is not going after Collins for her former position as the state's commissioner of professional and financial regulation from 1987 to 1992. I don't know whether that's because a lot of the deregulation happened at the federal level, because it happened after 1992, or both.

    October 7, 2008 3:11 PM

Leave a Comment

Login | Not a member yet? Click here to Join

(required)  
(optional)
(required)  




Tuesday, December 02, 2008  |  Sign In  |  Register
 
thePhoenix.com:
Phoenix Media/Communications Group:
TODAY'S FEATURED ADVERTISERS
Copyright © 2008 The Phoenix Media/Communications Group