Q&A #4 -- Flaherty Makeover?

Published Jun 26 2009, 12:35 PM by David S. Bernstein

"Mike" asks:

Michael Flaherty has gone through somewhat of a political makeover recently. He flipped his position on open government, the BU biolab, funding for street workers, charter schools, etc. Will he be able to reinvent himself successfully as a progressive?

I think this is a little unfair, but certainly Flaherty has, shall we say, "adapted" in some ways to fit the needs of the campaign. So has Menino, BTW, on some of the same issues.

I also think that Flaherty has a legitimate claim to being an ideological "progressive," by most definitions. What's tougher for him -- and arguably more important in this race -- is claiming to be a "progressive" reformer. That's the "political makeover" he's trying to accomplish: from City Hall insider to shake-things-up good-government change agent. His success in selling that reinvention remains to be seen.

Q&A #5: GOP Gov

Q&A #3 -- Posting Rules

1 Comments

BostonPatriot said:

Flaherty is a member in good standing of the dominant Massachusetts political culture: Parasitical. His political fate is tied to that of public employee (parasites) unions. The notion that he is an agent of change (positive) is risible.

June 27, 2009 4:40 AM